» Articles » PMID: 30304498

Deficiencies in Health-related Quality-of-life Assessment and Reporting: a Systematic Review of Oncology Randomized Phase III Trials Published Between 2012 and 2016

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Oct 11
PMID 30304498
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quality of life (QoL) is a relevant end point and a topic of growing interest by both scientific community and regulatory authorities. Our aim was to review QoL prevalence as an end point in cancer phase III trials published in major journals and to evaluate QoL reporting deficiencies in terms of under-reporting and delay of publication. All issues published between 2012 and 2016 by 11 major journals were hand-searched for primary publications of phase III trials in adult patients with solid tumors. Information about end points was derived from paper and study protocol, when available. Secondary QoL publications were searched in PubMed. In total, 446 publications were eligible. In 210 (47.1%), QoL was not included among end points. QoL was not an end point in 40.1% of trials in the advanced/metastatic setting, 39.7% of profit trials and 53.6% of non-profit trials. Out of 231 primary publications of trials with QoL as secondary or exploratory end point, QoL results were available in 143 (61.9%). QoL results were absent in 37.6% of publications in the advanced/metastatic setting, in 37.1% of profit trials and 39.3% of non-profit trials. Proportion of trials not including QoL as end point or with missing QoL results was relevant in all tumor types and for all treatment types. Overall, 70 secondary QoL publications were found: for trials without QoL results in the primary publication, probability of secondary publication was 12.5%, 30.9% and 40.3% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Proportion of trials not reporting QoL results was similar in trials with positive results (36.5%) and with negative results (39.4%), but the probability of secondary publication was higher in positive trials. QoL is not included among end points in a relevant proportion of recently published phase III trials in solid tumors. In addition, QoL results are subject to significant under-reporting and delay in publication.

Citing Articles

Time trends in health-related quality of life assessment and reporting within publications of oncology randomised phase III trials: a meta-research study.

Marandino L, Trastu F, Ghisoni E, Lombardi P, Mariniello A, Reale M BMJ Oncol. 2025; 2(1):e000021.

PMID: 39886519 PMC: 11235027. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2022-000021.


Modern cancer trials still lack information about QoL impacts on patients.

Hackshaw A BMJ Oncol. 2025; 2(1):e000062.

PMID: 39886485 PMC: 11203067. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000062.


Availability of quality-of-life results for clinical decisions: an evolving scenario.

Di Maio M BMJ Oncol. 2025; 3(1):e000406.

PMID: 39886170 PMC: 11256016. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000406.


Health-related quality of life outcomes reporting associated with FDA approvals in haematology and oncology.

Gupta M, Akhtar O, Bahl B, Mier-Hicks A, Attwood K, Catalfamo K BMJ Oncol. 2025; 3(1):e000369.

PMID: 39886148 PMC: 11256025. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000369.


Health-Related Quality of Life in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Systematic Review of Phase III Clinical Trials.

Romano F, Di Scipio F, Baima G, Franco F, Aimetti M, Berta G J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797336 PMC: 11721659. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010254.