» Articles » PMID: 30304298

Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Serrated Adenomas

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Oct 11
PMID 30304298
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Serrated polyps, which are considered to be precursors of colorectal carcinoma, include hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas. With the exception of hyperplastic polyps, all of these lesions must be removed. This study sought to examine whether underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is a safe and effective technique for treating serrated polyps.

Methods: Cases in which patients were submitted for underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and histologically diagnosed with sessile serrated adenoma were prospectively registered.

Results: The median patient age was 54.5 years (range, 48 to 72 years), and the patients included 4 men (28.5%) and 10 women (71.5%). One lesion (6.2%), 10 lesions (62.5%), 1 lesion (6.2%), 3 lesions (18.8%) and 1 lesion (6.2%) were found in the cecum, the ascending colon, the hepatic flexure, the transverse colon and the descending colon, respectively. The median lesion size was 20 mm (range, 10 to 35 mm). Eight lesions (50%) were removed en bloc, and the remaining eight lesions (50%) were removed using a piecemeal technique. None of the cases were complicated by perforation or delayed bleeding.

Conclusion: Underwater resection could be a feasible, safe and effective alternative for the resection of sessile serrated adenomas.

Citing Articles

Underwater Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Diving into the Depths.

Sferrazza S, Calabrese G, Maselli R, Morais R, Facciorusso A, Mavrogenis G Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(20).

PMID: 39456629 PMC: 11506518. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16203535.


Outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps-Insights from western India.

Sundaram S, Patil G, Jain A, Dalal A, Patil P, Mehta S Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024; 44(1):80-87.

PMID: 39243341 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-024-01661-8.


Endoscopic techniques for management of large colorectal polyps, strictures and leaks.

Gordon S, Eichenwald L, Systrom H Surg Open Sci. 2024; 20:156-168.

PMID: 39100384 PMC: 11296069. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.06.012.


Cold EMR vs. Hot EMR for the removal of sessile serrated polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ding C, Yang J, Wang X, Zhou Y, Khizar H, Jin Z BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):93.

PMID: 38509508 PMC: 10953062. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02325-2.


Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

de Souza M, Arruda do Espirito Santo P, Maluf-Filho F, Lenz L Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023; 38(1):208.

PMID: 37552342 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04505-7.


References
1.
Binmoeller K, Weilert F, Shah J, Bhat Y, Kane S . "Underwater" EMR without submucosal injection for large sessile colorectal polyps (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75(5):1086-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.12.022. View

2.
Rex D, Ahnen D, Baron J, Batts K, Burke C, Burt R . Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012; 107(9):1315-29. PMC: 3629844. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.161. View

3.
Pohl J, Schneider A, Vogell H, Mayer G, Kaiser G, Ell C . Pancolonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine versus standard colonoscopy for detection of neoplastic lesions: a randomised two-centre trial. Gut. 2010; 60(4):485-90. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.229534. View

4.
Binmoeller K, Hamerski C, Shah J, Bhat Y, Kane S . Underwater EMR of adenomas of the appendiceal orifice (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 83(3):638-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.079. View

5.
Abdeljawad K, Vemulapalli K, Kahi C, Cummings O, Snover D, Rex D . Sessile serrated polyp prevalence determined by a colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate and an experienced pathologist. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 81(3):517-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.04.064. View