» Articles » PMID: 30303807

Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation of Radiologists: Strategies and Tools for Simplifying a Complex Process

Overview
Journal Radiographics
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Oct 11
PMID 30303807
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Joint Commission, our major accreditation organization, requires that all physicians who have been granted privileges at an organization must undergo evaluation of and collect data relating to their performance, to make the decisions of privileging more objective and continuous by that organization. For radiologists, this so-called ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE) can be assessed by using the six general core competencies. These competencies were initially developed for graduate medical education and defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and have now been expanded to provide a general framework for defining categories of data to be collected in assessing the performance of practicing radiologists. Within each core competency, various radiology-relevant metrics exist that can be measured to fulfill the OPPE requirements. Each radiology department can determine the specific type of data to be collected, including determining what items are defined as acceptable performance metrics, what data or outcomes require further monitoring, and what specific data or data trends would trigger the need for an additional focused and more thorough professional practice evaluation, also known as a focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE). RSNA, 2018.

Citing Articles

A 360-degree evaluation of the professionalism and communication skills of technologists working in the radiology department of a public sector tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.

Rafiq N, Naz N, Memon R, Shoukat J, Kumari K, Shaikh H BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1176.

PMID: 39427176 PMC: 11491028. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06045-2.


Severe pain management in the emergency department: patient pathway as a new factor associated with IV morphine prescription.

Lvovschi V, Carrouel F, Hermann K, Lapostolle F, Joly L, Tavolacci M Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1352833.

PMID: 38454991 PMC: 10918692. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1352833.


Peer learning in abdominal radiology: iterative process improvements over a 20-year experience.

Siewert B, Brook O, Kruskal J Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023; 49(2):662-677.

PMID: 38093102 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04118-2.


Value-assessment of computer-assisted navigation strategies during percutaneous needle placement.

Boekestijn I, Azargoshasb S, van Oosterom M, Slof L, Dibbets-Schneider P, Dankelman J Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022; 17(10):1775-1785.

PMID: 35934773 PMC: 9468110. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-022-02719-8.


Bedside Evaluation of Early VAS/NRS Based Protocols for Intravenous Morphine in the Emergency Department: Reasons for Poor Follow-Up and Targeted Practices.

Lvovschi V, Hermann K, Lapostolle F, Joly L, Tavolacci M J Clin Med. 2021; 10(21).

PMID: 34768612 PMC: 8584399. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215089.