» Articles » PMID: 30294788

Post-metamorphic Ontogeny of Zoroaster Fulgens Thomson, 1873 (Asteroidea, Forcipulatacea)

Overview
Journal J Anat
Date 2018 Oct 9
PMID 30294788
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The complete ontogenetic development of an asteroid skeleton has never been described formally for any species. Here, we describe in detail the post-metamorphic ontogeny of Zoroaster fulgens Thomson, 1873. The major novelty of our work is the description of patterns of plate addition, the ontogeny of the internal ossicles, as well as the variability of ossicles according to their position along series. Seven specimens collected in the Rockall Basin (North Atlantic) were dissected with bleach and their anatomy was documented using a scanning electron microscope. The external anatomy was additionally observed on more than 30 specimens. We found that the overall structure of the skeleton does not change much between juveniles and adults, but the shape of individual ossicle changes during growth. Allometric scaling was particularly visible on the orals, ambulacrals and adambulacrals. The shape of an ossicle is more dependent of its position along the arm series than of its individual size. Many morphological features differentiate progressively during ontogeny, while others are expressed consistently among specimens. The study of this ontogenetic series allows discussing the homology between the structures present on the ossicles of Z. fulgens in particular and other forcipulatacean sea stars in general (i.e. muscles insertions and articulation areas). The new data obtained in this study provide a comprehensive framework of the anatomy and ontogeny of Z. fulgens that will help resolve taxonomic and phylogenetic controversies in the future.

Citing Articles

Phylogenetic and taxonomic revisions of Jurassic sea stars support a delayed evolutionary origin of the Asteriidae.

Fau M, Wright D, Ewin T, Gale A, Villier L PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18169.

PMID: 39494292 PMC: 11531740. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18169.

References
1.
Blowes L, Egertova M, Liu Y, Davis G, Terrill N, Gupta H . Body wall structure in the starfish Asterias rubens. J Anat. 2017; 231(3):325-341. PMC: 5554833. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12646. View

2.
Blake D, Mah C . Comments on "the phylogeny of post-Palaeozoic Asteroidea (Neoasteroidea, Echinodermata)" by A.S. Gale and perspectives on the systematics of the Asteroidea. Zootaxa. 2014; 3779:177-94. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3779.2.4. View

3.
Blake D . Sea star platastenras: ossicle morphology and taxonomic position. Science. 1972; 176(4032):306-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.176.4032.306. View

4.
Ameye L, De Becker G, Killian C, Wilt F, Kemps R, Kuypers S . Proteins and saccharides of the sea urchin organic matrix of mineralization: characterization and localization in the spine skeleton. J Struct Biol. 2001; 134(1):56-66. DOI: 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4361. View

5.
Czarkwiani A, Ferrario C, Dylus D, Sugni M, Oliveri P . Skeletal regeneration in the brittle star Amphiura filiformis. Front Zool. 2016; 13:18. PMC: 4841056. DOI: 10.1186/s12983-016-0149-x. View