» Articles » PMID: 30294787

Segmental Morphometrics of Bonobos (Pan Paniscus): Are They Really Different from Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes)?

Overview
Journal J Anat
Date 2018 Oct 9
PMID 30294787
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The inertial properties of body segments reflect performance and locomotor habits in primates. While Pan paniscus is generally described as more gracile, lighter in body mass, and as having relatively longer and heavier hindlimbs than Pan troglodytes, both species exhibit very similar patterns of (quadrupedal and bipedal) kinematics, but show slightly different locomotor repertoires. We used a geometric model to estimate the inertial properties for all body segments (i.e. head, trunk, upper and lower arms, hand, thigh, shank and foot) using external length and diameter measurements of 12 anaesthetized bonobos (eight adults and four immatures). We also calculated whole limb inertial properties. When we compared absolute and relative segment morphometric and inertial variables between bonobos and chimpanzees, we found that adult bonobos are significantly lighter than adult chimpanzees. The bonobo is also shorter in head length, upper and lower arm lengths, and foot length, and is generally lighter in most absolute segment mass values (except head and hand). In contrast, the bonobo has a longer trunk. When scaled relative to body mass, most differences disappear between the two species. Only the longer trunk and the shorter head of the bonobo remain apparent, as well as the lighter thigh compared with the chimpanzee. We found similar values of natural pendular periods of the limbs in both species, despite differences in absolute limb lengths, masses, mass centres (for the hindlimb) and moments of inertia. While our data contradict the commonly accepted view that bonobos have relatively longer and heavier hindlimbs than chimpanzees, they are consistent with the observed similarities in the quadrupedal and bipedal kinematics between these species. The morphological differences between both species are more subtle than those previously described from postcranial osteological materials.

Citing Articles

The work to swing limbs in humans versus chimpanzees and its relation to the metabolic cost of walking.

Luciano F, Ruggiero L, Minetti A, Pavei G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8970.

PMID: 38637567 PMC: 11026468. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59171-8.


Evidence for adolescent length growth spurts in bonobos and other primates highlights the importance of scaling laws.

Berghaenel A, Stevens J, Hohmann G, Deschner T, Behringer V Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37667589 PMC: 10479963. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.86635.


Insights into human evolution from 60 years of research on chimpanzees at Gombe.

Wilson M Evol Hum Sci. 2021; 3.

PMID: 33604500 PMC: 7886264. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2021.2.

References
1.
McHenry H, Corruccini R . The femur in early human evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1978; 49(4):473-87. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330490407. View

2.
Preuschoft H . What does "arboreal locomotion" mean exactly and what are the relationships between "climbing", environment and morphology?. Z Morphol Anthropol. 2002; 83(2-3):171-88. View

3.
Crompton R, Li Y, ALEXANDER R, Wang W, Gunther M . Segment inertial properties of primates: new techniques for laboratory and field studies of locomotion. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1996; 99(4):547-70. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199604)99:4<547::AID-AJPA3>3.0.CO;2-R. View

4.
Hunt K . Positional behavior of Pan troglodytes in the Mahale Mountains and Gombe Stream National Parks, Tanzania. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1992; 87(1):83-105. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330870108. View

5.
Zihlman A, Mootnick A, Underwood C . Anatomical Contributions to Hylobatid Taxonomy and Adaptation. Int J Primatol. 2011; 32(4):865-877. PMC: 3139862. DOI: 10.1007/s10764-011-9506-y. View