» Articles » PMID: 30293920

Methods of Gestational Age Assessment Influence the Observed Association Between Antiretroviral Therapy Exposure, Preterm Delivery, and Small-for-gestational Age Infants: a Prospective Study in Cape Town, South Africa

Overview
Journal Ann Epidemiol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Oct 9
PMID 30293920
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Heterogeneous findings exist on antiretroviral therapy (ART) use in pregnancy and preterm delivery (PTD) or infants born small-for-gestational age (SGA). Whether reported differences may be explained by methods used to ascertain gestational age (GA) has not been explored.

Methods: We enrolled consecutive pregnant women attending a large primary care antenatal clinic in South Africa. Public-sector midwives assessed GA by last menstrual period (LMP) and symphysis-fundal height (SFH). Separately, if clinical GA was less than 24 weeks, ultrasound (US) was performed by a research sonographer blinded to midwife assessments. In analysis, the impact of measurement error on the association between HIV/ART status and birth outcome by GA method was assessed, and factors associated with clinical GA underestimation or overestimation identified.

Results: In 1787 women included overall, estimated PTD incidence was 36% by LMP, 17% by SFH, and 11% by US. PTD risk was higher for HIV-infected than HIV-uninfected women using US-GA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.95; 95% CI 1.10-3.46); for LMP/SFH-GA, the associations were smaller and not significant. These findings persisted after adjustment for age, parity, height, and previous PTD. PTD risk did not vary by timing of ART initiation (before or during pregnancy) for any method. Elevated BMI and older age were associated with decreased risk of underestimation by both LMP and SFH; HIV status and obesity were associated with increased risk of overestimation by SFH. There were no differences in SGA incidence across GA methods.

Conclusions: Findings for an association between HIV/ART and birth outcomes are substantially influenced by GA assessment method. With growing public health interest in this association, future research efforts should seek to standardize optimal measures of gestation.

Citing Articles

Adverse perinatal outcomes associated with different classes of antiretroviral drugs in pregnant women with HIV.

Hey M, Thompson L, Portwood C, Sexton H, Kumarendran M, Brandon Z AIDS. 2024; 39(2):162-174.

PMID: 39407417 PMC: 11676599. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004032.


Preterm birth among women with HIV: impact of preconception cART initiation.

Duffy C, Herlihy J, Zulu E, Mwananyanda L, Forman L, Heeren T AIDS. 2024; 38(12):1749-1757.

PMID: 39017638 PMC: 11356690. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003979.


Leveraging External Validation Data: The Challenges of Transporting Measurement Error Parameters.

Ross R, Cole S, Edwards J, Zivich P, Westreich D, Daniels J Epidemiology. 2023; 35(2):196-207.

PMID: 38079241 PMC: 10841744. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001701.


Safety surveillance for PrEP in pregnant and breastfeeding women.

Fairlie L, Lavies D, Kalk E, Mhlongo O, Patel F, Technau K Front Reprod Health. 2023; 5:1221101.

PMID: 37854936 PMC: 10581206. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2023.1221101.


Combining deep learning and intelligent biometry to extract ultrasound standard planes and assess early gestational weeks.

Pei Y, E L, Dai C, Han J, Wang H, Liang H Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(12):9390-9400.

PMID: 37392231 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09808-5.


References
1.
Chen J, Ribaudo H, Souda S, Parekh N, Ogwu A, Lockman S . Highly active antiretroviral therapy and adverse birth outcomes among HIV-infected women in Botswana. J Infect Dis. 2012; 206(11):1695-705. PMC: 3488194. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis553. View

2.
Dietz P, England L, Callaghan W, Pearl M, Wier M, Kharrazi M . A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007; 21 Suppl 2:62-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00862.x. View

3.
Lynch C, Zhang J . The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007; 21 Suppl 2:86-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00865.x. View

4.
Njom Nlend A, Nga Motaze A, Moyo Tetang S, Zeudja C, Ngantcha M, Tejiokem M . Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight after In Utero Exposure to Antiretrovirals Initiated during Pregnancy in Yaoundé, Cameroon. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0150565. PMC: 4801361. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150565. View

5.
Haglund B . Birthweight distributions by gestational age: comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using data from the Swedish Birth Registry. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007; 21 Suppl 2:72-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00863.x. View