» Articles » PMID: 30291798

Individualized Survival Prediction for Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer in the Human Papillomavirus Era

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Oct 7
PMID 30291798
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accurate, individualized prognostication in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is vital for patient counseling and treatment decision making. With the emergence of human papillomavirus (HPV) as an important biomarker in OPSCC, calculators incorporating this variable have been developed. However, it is critical to characterize their accuracy prior to implementation.

Methods: Four OPSCC calculators were identified that integrate HPV into their estimation of 5-year overall survival. Treatment outcomes for 856 patients with OPSCC who were evaluated at a single institution from 2003 through 2016 were analyzed. Predicted survival probabilities were generated for each patient using each calculator. Calculator performance was assessed and compared using Kaplan-Meier plots, receiver operating characteristic curves, concordance statistics, and calibration plots.

Results: Correlation between pairs of calculators varied, with coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.90. Only 3 of 6 pairs of calculators yielded predictions within 10% of each other for at least 50% of patients. Kaplan-Meier curves of calculator-defined risk groups demonstrated reasonable stratification. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.74 to 0.80, and concordance statistics ranged from 0.71 to 0.78. Each calculator demonstrated superior discriminatory ability compared with clinical staging according to the seventh and eighth editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual. Among models, the Denmark calculator was found to be best calibrated to observed outcomes.

Conclusions: Existing calculators exhibited reasonable estimation of survival in patients with OPSCC, but there was considerable variability in predictions for individual patients, which limits the clinical usefulness of these calculators. Given the increasing role of personalized treatment in patients with OPSCC, further work is needed to improve accuracy and precision, possibly through the identification and incorporation of additional biomarkers.

Citing Articles

Systematic review of prognostic models for predicting recurrence and survival in patients with treated oropharyngeal cancer.

Dretzke J, Abou-Foul A, Albon E, Hillier B, Scandrett K, Price M BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e090393.

PMID: 39638589 PMC: 11624838. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090393.


Advancing Head and Neck Cancer Survival Prediction via Multi-Label Learning and Deep Model Interpretation.

Chen M, Wang K, Wang J ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38764586 PMC: 11100915.


Vision Transformer-Based Multilabel Survival Prediction for Oropharynx Cancer After Radiation Therapy.

Chen M, Wang K, Wang J Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023; 118(4):1123-1134.

PMID: 37939732 PMC: 11161220. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.022.


Identification of an individualized therapy prognostic signature for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Lin C, Chen Y, Pan J, Lu Q, Ji P, Lin S BMC Genomics. 2023; 24(1):221.

PMID: 37106442 PMC: 10142243. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09325-1.


Head and neck cancer predictive risk estimator to determine control and therapeutic outcomes of radiotherapy (HNC-PREDICTOR): development, international multi-institutional validation, and web implementation of clinic-ready model-based risk....

van Dijk L, Mohamed A, Ahmed S, Nipu N, Marai G, Wahid K Eur J Cancer. 2022; 178:150-161.

PMID: 36442460 PMC: 9853413. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.10.011.


References
1.
Lydiatt W, Patel S, OSullivan B, Brandwein M, Ridge J, Migliacci J . Head and Neck cancers-major changes in the American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017; 67(2):122-137. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21389. View

2.
Peterson L, Bellile E, Wolf G, Virani S, Shuman A, Taylor J . Cigarette use, comorbidities, and prognosis in a prospective head and neck squamous cell carcinoma population. Head Neck. 2016; 38(12):1810-1820. PMC: 5391974. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24515. View

3.
Kattan M, Hess K, Amin M, Lu Y, Moons K, Gershenwald J . American Joint Committee on Cancer acceptance criteria for inclusion of risk models for individualized prognosis in the practice of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66(5):370-4. PMC: 4955656. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21339. View

4.
Leemans C, Snijders P, Brakenhoff R . The molecular landscape of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018; 18(5):269-282. DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2018.11. View

5.
Stacey D, Paquet L, Samant R . Exploring cancer treatment decision-making by patients: a descriptive study. Curr Oncol. 2010; 17(4):85-93. PMC: 2913835. DOI: 10.3747/co.v17i4.527. View