» Articles » PMID: 30286811

Chinese Expert Consensus on Echelons Treatment of Thoracic Injury in Modern Warfare

Overview
Journal Mil Med Res
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2018 Oct 6
PMID 30286811
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The emergency treatment of thoracic injuries varies of general conditions and modern warfare. However, there are no unified battlefield treatment guidelines for thoracic injuries in the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA). An expert consensus has been reached based on the epidemiology of thoracic injuries and the concept of battlefield treatment combined with the existing levels of military medical care in modern warfare. Since there are no differences in the specialized treatment for thoracic injuries between general conditions and modern warfare, first aid, emergency treatment, and early treatment of thoracic injuries are introduced separately in three levels in this consensus. At Level I facilities, tension pneumothorax and open pneumothorax are recommended for initial assessment during the first aid stage. Re-evaluation and further treatment for hemothorax, flail chest, and pericardial tamponade are recommended at Level II facilities. At Level III facilities, simple surgical operations such as emergency thoracotomy and debridement surgery for open pneumothorax are recommended. The grading standard for evidence evaluation and recommendation was used to reach this expert consensus.

Citing Articles

Management of thoracoabdominal gunshot injuries by using minimally invasive surgery at role 2 deployed field hospitals in Ukraine.

Lurin I, Vorovskiy O, Makarov V, Khoroshun E, Nehoduiko V, Ryzhenko A BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):183.

PMID: 38877409 PMC: 11177506. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02475-3.


Hemopneumothorax detection through the process of artificial evolution - a feasibility study.

Sommer A, Mark N, Kohlberg G, Gerasi R, Avraham L, Fan-Marko R Mil Med Res. 2021; 8(1):27.

PMID: 33894775 PMC: 8070275. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-021-00319-2.

References
1.
de Lesquen H, Beranger F, Berbis J, Boddaert G, Poichotte A, Pons F . Challenges in war-related thoracic injury faced by French military surgeons in Afghanistan (2009-2013). Injury. 2016; 47(9):1939-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.06.008. View

2.
Keneally R, Szpisjak D . Thoracic trauma in Iraq and Afghanistan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 74(5):1292-7. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828c467d. View

3.
Beckett A, Savage E, Pannell D, Acharya S, Kirkpatrick A, Tien H . Needle decompression for tension pneumothorax in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: do catheters placed in the midaxillary line kink more often than those in the midclavicular line?. J Trauma. 2011; 71(5 Suppl 1):S408-12. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318232e558. View

4.
Beckett A, Pelletier P, Mamczak C, Benfield R, Elster E . Multidisciplinary trauma team care in Kandahar, Afghanistan: current injury patterns and care practices. Injury. 2012; 43(12):2072-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.005. View

5.
Liu H, Wang Z, Zhang J, Wu H, Yin R, Xu B . Temporarily pulmonary hilum clamping as a thoracic damage-control procedure for lung trauma in swine. J Trauma. 2010; 68(4):810-7. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b16d15. View