» Articles » PMID: 30286187

Comparison of the IPSA and HIPO Algorithms for Interstitial Tongue High-dose-rate Brachytherapy

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Oct 5
PMID 30286187
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) stochastic algorithm with the hybrid inverse planning and optimization (HIPO) algorithm for interstitial tongue high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.

Methods: Twenty patients who received radiotherapy for tongue cancer using interstitial HDR brachytherapy were retrospectively selected for this study. Oncentra Brachy v. 4.3 was used for IPSA and HIPO planning. Four to eight fixed catheter configurations were determined according to the target shape. During the optimization process, predetermined constrain values were used for each IPSA and HIPO plan. The dosimetric parameters and dwell time were analyzed to evaluate the performances of the plans.

Results: The total dwell time using IPSA was 4 seconds longer than that of HIPO. The number of active positions per catheter for the IPSA plans were approximately 2.5 fewer than those of the HIPO plans. The dose-volumetric parameters related to the clinical target volume with IPSA were lower than those with HIPO. In terms of the dose-volumetric parameters related to normal tissue, HIPO tended to associate with slightly higher values than IPSA, without statistical significance. After GrO, the target coverages were satisfied to clinical goal for all patients. The total dwell times was approximately increased by 10%.

Conclusions: The IPSA and HIPO dose optimization algorithms generate similar dosimetric results. In terms of the dwell time, HIPO appears to be more beneficial.

Citing Articles

The evolving landscape of head and neck brachytherapy: A scoping review.

Cua M, Jainar C, Calapit J, Mejia M, Bacorro W J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2024; 16(3):225-231.

PMID: 39629087 PMC: 11609864. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2024.140348.


Comparative analysis of dosimetric and radiobiological models of IPSA and HIPO algorithms in combined intra-cavitary/interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Yan C, Wang X, Wen A, Luo J, Zhang S, Wang P J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2023; 15(3):212-219.

PMID: 37425198 PMC: 10324594. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2023.128894.


Inverse planning optimization with lead block effectively suppresses dose to the mandible in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for tongue cancer.

Akino Y, Shiomi H, Tsujimoto T, Hamatani N, Hirata T, Oda M Jpn J Radiol. 2023; 41(11):1290-1297.

PMID: 37273111 PMC: 10613594. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-023-01451-w.


Does inverse planning improve plan quality in interstitial high-dose-rate breast brachytherapy?.

Major T, Frohlich G, Meszaros N, Smanyko V, Polgar C J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020; 12(2):166-174.

PMID: 32395141 PMC: 7207228. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.94584.


Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.

Frohlich G, Geszti G, Vizkeleti J, Agoston P, Polgar C, Major T Strahlenther Onkol. 2019; 195(11):991-1000.

PMID: 31482321 PMC: 6811387. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01513-x.

References
1.
Yamazaki H, Yoshida K, Yoshioka Y, Shimizutani K, Furukawa S, Koizumi M . High dose rate brachytherapy for oral cancer. J Radiat Res. 2012; 54(1):1-17. PMC: 3534285. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrs103. View

2.
Pouliot J, Kim Y, Lessard E, Hsu I, Vigneron D, Kurhanewicz J . Inverse planning for HDR prostate brachytherapy used to boost dominant intraprostatic lesions defined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 59(4):1196-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.055. View

3.
Choi C, Park S, Kim J, Kim J, Kim K, Carlson J . Quality of tri-Co-60 MR-IGRT treatment plans in comparison with VMAT treatment plans for spine SABR. Br J Radiol. 2016; 90(1070):20160652. PMC: 5685120. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160652. View

4.
Umeda M, Komatsubara H, Nishimatsu N, Yokoo S, Shibuya Y, Komori T . High-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy for stage I-II tongue cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000; 90(5):667-70. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2000.110087. View

5.
Takacsi-Nagy Z, Martinez-Mongue R, Mazeron J, Anker C, Harrison L . American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Combined external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy for base of tongue tumors and other head and neck sites in the era of new technologies. Brachytherapy. 2016; 16(1):44-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.07.005. View