Effect of Hidden Relatedness on Single-Step Genetic Evaluation in an Advanced Open-Pollinated Breeding Program
Authors
Affiliations
Open-pollinated (OP) mating is frequently used in forest tree breeding due to the relative temporal and financial efficiency of the approach. The trade-off is the lower precision of the estimated genetic parameters. Pedigree/sib-ship reconstruction has been proven as a tool to correct and complete pedigree information and to improve the precision of genetic parameter estimates. Our study analyzed an advanced generation Eucalyptus population from an OP breeding program using single-step genetic evaluation. The relationship matrix inferred from sib-ship reconstruction was used to rescale the marker-based relationship matrix (G matrix). This was compared with a second scenario that used rescaling based on the documented pedigree. The proposed single-step model performed better with respect to both model fit and the theoretical accuracy of breeding values. We found that the prediction accuracy was superior when using the pedigree information only when compared with using a combination of the pedigree and genomic information. This pattern appeared to be mainly a result of accumulated unrecognized relatedness over several breeding cycles, resulting in breeding values being shrunk toward the population mean. Using biased, pedigree-based breeding values as the base with which to correlate predicted GEBVs, resulted in the underestimation of prediction accuracies. Using breeding values estimated on the basis of sib-ship reconstruction resulted in increased prediction accuracies of the genotyped individuals. Therefore, selection of the correct base for estimation of prediction accuracy is critical. The beneficial impact of sib-ship reconstruction using G matrix rescaling was profound, especially in traits with inbreeding depression, such as stem diameter.
Accelerating eucalypt clone selection pipeline via cloned progeny trials and molecular data.
Benatti T, Ferreira F, da Costa R, de Moraes M, Aguiar A, da Costa Dias D Plant Methods. 2025; 21(1):19.
PMID: 39953507 PMC: 11827336. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-025-01342-3.
Ousmael K, Cappa E, Hansen J, Hendre P, Hansen O BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):9.
PMID: 38166623 PMC: 10759591. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09907-z.
Simiqueli G, Resende R, Takahashi E, de Sousa J, Grattapaglia D Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1252504.
PMID: 37965018 PMC: 10641691. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1252504.
Single and multi-trait genomic prediction for agronomic traits in Euterpe edulis.
Bravim Canal G, Barreto C, de Almeida F, Zaidan I, do Couto D, Azevedo C PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0275407.
PMID: 37027420 PMC: 10081805. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275407.
Accounting for population structure in genomic predictions of Eucalyptus globulus.
Callister A, Bermann M, Elms S, Bradshaw B, Lourenco D, Brawner J G3 (Bethesda). 2022; 12(9).
PMID: 35920792 PMC: 9434241. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac180.