» Articles » PMID: 30284186

Uncertainty Quantification for Non-invasive Assessment of Pressure Drop Across a Coarctation of the Aorta Using CFD

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2018 Oct 5
PMID 30284186
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Numerical assessment of the pressure drop across an aortic coarctation using CFD is a promising approach to replace invasive catheter-based measurements. The aim of this study was to investigate and quantify the uncertainty of numerical calculation of the pressure drop introduced during two essential steps of medical image processing: segmentation of the patient-specific geometry and measurement of patient-specific flow rates from 4D-flow-MRI.

Methods: Based on the baseline segmentation, geometries with different stenosis diameters were generated for a sample of ten patients. The pressure drop generated by these geometries was calculated for different volume flow rates using computational fluid dynamics. Based on these simulations, a second order polynomial fit was calculated. Based on these polynomial fits an uncertainty of pressure drop calculation was quantified.

Results: The calculated pressure drop values varied strongly between the patients. In four patients, pressure drops above and below the clinical threshold of 20 mmHg were found. The median standard deviation of the pressure drop was 2.3 mmHg. The sensitivity of the pressure drop toward changes in the volume flow rate or the stenosis geometry varied between patients.

Conclusion: The uncertainty of numerical pressure drop calculation introduced by uncertainties during image segmentation and measurement of volume flow rates was comparable to the uncertainty of pressure drop measurements using invasive catheterization. However, in some patients this uncertainty would have led to different treatment decision. Therefore, patient-specific uncertainty assessment might help to better understand the reliability of a numerically calculated biomarker as the pressure drop across an aortic coarctation.

Citing Articles

Application of physics-based flow models in cardiovascular medicine: Current practices and challenges.

Vardhan M, Randles A Biophys Rev (Melville). 2024; 2(1):011302.

PMID: 38505399 PMC: 10903374. DOI: 10.1063/5.0040315.


Non-invasive Estimation of Pressure Drop Across Aortic Coarctations: Validation of 0D and 3D Computational Models with In Vivo Measurements.

Nair P, Pfaller M, Dual S, McElhinney D, Ennis D, Marsden A Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 52(5):1335-1346.

PMID: 38341399 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03457-5.


Segmentation of the aorta in systolic phase from 4D flow MRI: multi-atlas vs. deep learning.

Marin-Castrillon D, Geronzi L, Boucher A, Lin S, Morgant M, Cochet A MAGMA. 2023; 36(5):687-700.

PMID: 36800143 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01066-2.


Reducing Geometric Uncertainty in Computational Hemodynamics by Deep Learning-Assisted Parallel-Chain MCMC.

Du P, Wang J J Biomech Eng. 2022; 144(12).

PMID: 36166284 PMC: 9632478. DOI: 10.1115/1.4055809.


Inverse problems in blood flow modeling: A review.

Nolte D, Bertoglio C Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2022; 38(8):e3613.

PMID: 35526113 PMC: 9541505. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3613.