» Articles » PMID: 30281679

Developing a Model to Predict Unfavourable Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Tuberculosis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Co-infection in Delhi, India

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection have worse TB treatment outcomes compared to patients with TB alone. The distribution of unfavourable treatment outcomes differs by socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, allowing for early identification of patients at risk.

Objective: To develop a statistical model that can provide individual probabilities of unfavourable outcomes based on demographic and clinical characteristics of TB-HIV co-infected patients.

Methodology: We used data from all TB patients with known HIV-positive test results (aged ≥15 years) registered for first-line anti-TB treatment (ATT) in 2015 under the Revised National TB Control Programme (RNTCP) in Delhi, India. We included variables on demographics and pre-treatment clinical characteristics routinely recorded and reported to RNTCP and the National AIDS Control Organization. Binomial logistic regression was used to develop a statistical model to estimate probabilities of unfavourable TB treatment outcomes (i.e., death, loss to follow-up, treatment failure, transfer out of program, and a switch to drug-resistant regimen).

Results: Of 55,260 TB patients registered for ATT in 2015 in Delhi, 928 (2%) had known HIV-positive test results. Of these, 816 (88%) had drug-sensitive TB and were ≥15 years. Among 816 TB-HIV patients included, 157 (19%) had unfavourable TB treatment outcomes. We developed a model for predicting unfavourable outcomes using age, sex, disease classification (pulmonary versus extra-pulmonary), TB treatment category (new or previously treated case), sputum smear grade, known HIV status at TB diagnosis, antiretroviral treatment at TB diagnosis, and CD4 cell count at ATT initiation. The chi-square p-value for model calibration assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was 0.15. The model discrimination, measured as the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, was 0.78.

Conclusion: The model had good internal validity, but should be validated with an independent cohort of TB-HIV co-infected patients to assess its performance before clinical or programmatic use.

Citing Articles

A Scoring System Based on Laboratory Parameters and Clinical Features to Predict Unfavorable Treatment Outcomes in Multidrug- and Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients.

Yan J, Luo H, Nie Q, Hu S, Yu Q, Wang X Infect Drug Resist. 2023; 16:225-237.

PMID: 36647452 PMC: 9840374. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S397304.


Development of prognostic scoring system for predicting 1-year mortality among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in South India.

Krishnamoorthy Y, Ezhumalai K, Murali S, Rajaa S, Majella M, Sarkar S J Public Health (Oxf). 2022; 45(2):e184-e195.

PMID: 36038507 PMC: 10273380. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac087.


Development and validation of a nomogram for the prediction of late culture conversion among multi-drug resistant tuberculosis patients in North West Ethiopia: An application of prediction modelling.

Anley D, Akalu T, Merid M, Dessie A, Zemene M, Demissie B PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272877.

PMID: 35947625 PMC: 9365138. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272877.


Development and Validation of a Nomogram for the Prediction of Unfavorable Treatment Outcome Among Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Patients in North West Ethiopia: An Application of Prediction Modelling.

Anley D, Akalu T, Merid M, Tsegaye T Infect Drug Resist. 2022; 15:3887-3904.

PMID: 35903578 PMC: 9317379. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S372351.


Systematic review of prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes in adults.

Peetluk L, Ridolfi F, Rebeiro P, Liu D, Rolla V, Sterling T BMJ Open. 2021; 11(3):e044687.

PMID: 33653759 PMC: 7929865. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044687.


References
1.
Subbaraman R, Nathavitharana R, Satyanarayana S, Pai M, Thomas B, Chadha V . The Tuberculosis Cascade of Care in India's Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2016; 13(10):e1002149. PMC: 5079571. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002149. View

2.
Sachdeva K, Raizada N, Gupta R, Nair S, Denkinger C, Paramasivan C . The Potential Impact of Up-Front Drug Sensitivity Testing on India's Epidemic of Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0131438. PMC: 4488842. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131438. View

3.
Moons K, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Grobbee D, Altman D . Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?. BMJ. 2009; 338:b375. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b375. View

4.
Tubert-Brohman I, Sherman W, Repasky M, Beuming T . Improved docking of polypeptides with Glide. J Chem Inf Model. 2013; 53(7):1689-99. DOI: 10.1021/ci400128m. View

5.
Sudharsan B, Peeples M, Shomali M . Hypoglycemia prediction using machine learning models for patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 9(1):86-90. PMC: 4495530. DOI: 10.1177/1932296814554260. View