» Articles » PMID: 30279220

Distinguishing the Differences in β-glycosylceramidase Folds, Dynamics, and Actions Informs Therapeutic Uses

Overview
Journal J Lipid Res
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2018 Oct 4
PMID 30279220
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Glycosyl hydrolases (GHs) are carbohydrate-active enzymes that hydrolyze a specific β-glycosidic bond in glycoconjugate substrates; β-glucosidases degrade glucosylceramide, a ubiquitous glycosphingolipid. GHs are grouped into structurally similar families that themselves can be grouped into clans. GH1, GH5, and GH30 glycosidases belong to clan A hydrolases with a catalytic (β/α) TIM barrel domain, whereas GH116 belongs to clan O with a catalytic (α/α) domain. In humans, GH abnormalities underlie metabolic diseases. The lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase (family GH30), deficient in Gaucher disease and implicated in Parkinson disease etiology, and the cytosol-facing membrane-bound glucosylceramidase (family GH116) remove the terminal glucose from the ceramide lipid moiety. Here, we compare enzyme differences in fold, action, dynamics, and catalytic domain stabilization by binding site occupancy. We also explore other glycosidases with reported glycosylceramidase activity, including human cytosolic β-glucosidase, intestinal lactase-phlorizin hydrolase, and lysosomal galactosylceramidase. Last, we describe the successful translation of research to practice: recombinant glycosidases and glucosylceramide metabolism modulators are approved drug products (enzyme replacement therapies). Activity-based probes now facilitate the diagnosis of enzyme deficiency and screening for compounds that interact with the catalytic pocket of glycosidases. Future research may deepen the understanding of the functional variety of these enzymes and their therapeutic potential.

Citing Articles

CLN3 deficiency leads to neurological and metabolic perturbations during early development.

Heins-Marroquin U, Singh R, Perathoner S, Gavotto F, Merino Ruiz C, Patraskaki M Life Sci Alliance. 2024; 7(3).

PMID: 38195117 PMC: 10776888. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202302057.


Advancements on the Multifaceted Roles of Sphingolipids in Hematological Malignancies.

Raza Y, Atallah J, Luberto C Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(21).

PMID: 36361536 PMC: 9654982. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232112745.


Dynamics of Ligand Binding to a Rigid Glycosidase*.

Ben Bdira F, Waudby C, Volkov A, Schroder S, Ab E, Codee J Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020; 59(46):20508-20514.

PMID: 32533782 PMC: 7693232. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202003236.


Plant Glycosides and Glycosidases: A Treasure-Trove for Therapeutics.

Kytidou K, Artola M, Overkleeft H, Aerts J Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:357.

PMID: 32318081 PMC: 7154165. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00357.


Glucocerebrosidase: Functions in and Beyond the Lysosome.

Boer D, van Smeden J, Bouwstra J, Aerts J J Clin Med. 2020; 9(3).

PMID: 32182893 PMC: 7141376. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030736.

References
1.
Aerts J, Hollak C, Boot R, Groener A . Biochemistry of glycosphingolipid storage disorders: implications for therapeutic intervention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003; 358(1433):905-14. PMC: 1693181. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1273. View

2.
Eneyskaya E, Brumer 3rd H, Backinowsky L, Ivanen D, Kulminskaya A, Shabalin K . Enzymatic synthesis of beta-xylanase substrates: transglycosylation reactions of the beta-xylosidase from Aspergillus sp. Carbohydr Res. 2003; 338(4):313-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6215(02)00467-6. View

3.
Ben Bdira F, Jiang J, Kallemeijn W, de Haan A, Florea B, Bleijlevens B . Hydrophobic Interactions Contribute to Conformational Stabilization of Endoglycoceramidase II by Mechanism-Based Probes. Biochemistry. 2016; 55(34):4823-35. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00363. View

4.
Davies G, Henrissat B . Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases. Structure. 1995; 3(9):853-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00220-9. View

5.
Atsumi S, Nosaka C, Iinuma H, Umezawa K . Inhibition of glucocerebrosidase and induction of neural abnormality by cyclophellitol in mice. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1992; 297(2):362-7. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(92)90685-p. View