Micro-CT - a Digital 3D Microstructural Voyage into Scaffolds: a Systematic Review of the Reported Methods and Results

Overview

Journal Biomater Res

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2018 Oct 3

PMID 30275969

Citations 26

Authors

Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz

Joaquim Miguel Oliveira

Rui L Reis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Cell behavior is the key to tissue regeneration. Given the fact that most of the cells used in tissue engineering are anchorage-dependent, their behavior including adhesion, growth, migration, matrix synthesis, and differentiation is related to the design of the scaffolds. Thus, characterization of the scaffolds is highly required. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) provides a powerful platform to analyze, visualize, and explore any portion of interest in the scaffold in a 3D fashion without cutting or destroying it with the benefit of almost no sample preparation need.

Main Body: This review highlights the relationship between the scaffold microstructure and cell behavior, and provides the basics of the micro-CT method. In this work, we also analyzed the original papers that were published in 2016 through a systematic search to address the need for specific improvements in the methods section of the papers including the amount of provided information from the obtained results.

Conclusion: Micro-CT offers a unique microstructural analysis of biomaterials, notwithstanding the associated challenges and limitations. Future studies that will include micro-CT characterization of scaffolds should report the important details of the method, and the derived quantitative and qualitative information can be maximized.

Citing Articles

Direct Scaffold-Coupled Electrical Stimulation of Chondrogenic Progenitor Cells through Graphene Foam Bioscaffolds to Control Mechanical Properties of Graphene Foam - Cell Composites.

Sawyer M, Semodji A, Nielson O, Rektor A, Burgoyne H, Eppel M Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39764126 PMC: 11703340. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5589589/v1.

The Effect of Micro-Computed Tomography Thresholding Methods on Bone Micromorphometric Analysis.

Buyuksungur A, Szabo B, Dobai A, Orhan K J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(11).

PMID: 39590547 PMC: 11594970. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15110343.

The association between metabolite profiles and impaired bone microstructure in adult growth hormone deficient rats.

Guo X, Liu S, Hu W, Lyu X, Xu H, Zhu H BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):883.

PMID: 39508246 PMC: 11539809. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08010-y.

Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Micro-CT Visualization within Collagen Scaffolds in an Aqueous Environment.

Tkachev S, Chepelova N, Galechyan G, Ershov B, Golub D, Popova E Cells. 2024; 13(15.

PMID: 39120266 PMC: 11311787. DOI: 10.3390/cells13151234.

Regeneration of Rabbit Calvarial Defects with Combination of Stem Cells and Enamel Matrix Derivative: A Microcomputed Tomography and Histological Evaluation Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Cell Constructs.

Na K, Lee H, Lee J, Park J Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(3).

PMID: 38541178 PMC: 10971790. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60030451.

References

Maiti S, Ninu A, Sangeetha P, Mathew D, Tamilmahan P, Kritaniya D . Mesenchymal stem cells-seeded bio-ceramic construct for bone regeneration in large critical-size bone defect in rabbit. J Stem Cells Regen Med. 2017; 12(2):87-99. PMC: 5227108. View

Beck A, Murphy D, Carey-Smith R, Wood D, Zheng M . Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects With Microfracture and Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis Leads to Extensive Subchondral Bone Cyst Formation in a Sheep Model. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(10):2629-2643. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516652619. View

Jones A, Arns C, Sheppard A, Hutmacher D, Milthorpe B, Knackstedt M . Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT. Biomaterials. 2007; 28(15):2491-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.046. View

Paulus M, Gleason S, Kennel S, Hunsicker P, Johnson D . High resolution X-ray computed tomography: an emerging tool for small animal cancer research. Neoplasia. 2000; 2(1-2):62-70. PMC: 1531867. DOI: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900069. View

Karande T, Ong J, Agrawal C . Diffusion in musculoskeletal tissue engineering scaffolds: design issues related to porosity, permeability, architecture, and nutrient mixing. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005; 32(12):1728-43. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-004-7825-2. View

Chen S, Nakamoto T, Kawazoe N, Chen G . Engineering multi-layered skeletal muscle tissue by using 3D microgrooved collagen scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2015; 73:23-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.010. View

Liu X, Bao C, Xu H, Pan J, Hu J, Wang P . Osteoprotegerin gene-modified BMSCs with hydroxyapatite scaffold for treating critical-sized mandibular defects in ovariectomized osteoporotic rats. Acta Biomater. 2016; 42:378-388. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.019. View

Sharma S, Sapkota D, Xue Y, Sun Y, Finne-Wistrand A, Bruland O . Adenoviral Mediated Expression of BMP2 by Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Cultured in 3D Copolymer Scaffolds Enhances Bone Formation. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0147507. PMC: 4725849. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147507. View

McBeath R, Pirone D, Nelson C, Bhadriraju K, Chen C . Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell. 2004; 6(4):483-95. DOI: 10.1016/s1534-5807(04)00075-9. View

10.

Cui W, Sun G, Qu Y, Xiong Y, Sun T, Ji Y . Repair of rat calvarial defects using Si-doped hydroxyapatite scaffolds loaded with a bone morphogenetic protein-2-related peptide. J Orthop Res. 2016; 34(11):1874-1882. DOI: 10.1002/jor.23208. View

11.

Costantini M, Colosi C, Mozetic P, Jaroszewicz J, Tosato A, Rainer A . Correlation between porous texture and cell seeding efficiency of gas foaming and microfluidic foaming scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016; 62:668-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.010. View

12.

Lv X, Li Z, Chen S, Xie M, Huang J, Peng X . Structural and functional evaluation of oxygenating keratin/silk fibroin scaffold and initial assessment of their potential for urethral tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2016; 84:99-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.032. View

13.

Zhang J, Wang H, Shi J, Wang Y, Lai K, Yang X . Combination of simvastatin, calcium silicate/gypsum, and gelatin and bone regeneration in rabbit calvarial defects. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:23422. PMC: 4800449. DOI: 10.1038/srep23422. View

14.

Chamieh F, Collignon A, Coyac B, Lesieur J, Ribes S, Sadoine J . Accelerated craniofacial bone regeneration through dense collagen gel scaffolds seeded with dental pulp stem cells. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:38814. PMC: 5146967. DOI: 10.1038/srep38814. View

15.

Tansik G, Kilic E, Beter M, Demiralp B, Kiziltas Sendur G, Can N . A glycosaminoglycan mimetic peptide nanofiber gel as an osteoinductive scaffold. Biomater Sci. 2016; 4(9):1328-39. DOI: 10.1039/c6bm00179c. View

16.

Nazarian A, Snyder B, Zurakowski D, Muller R . Quantitative micro-computed tomography: a non-invasive method to assess equivalent bone mineral density. Bone. 2008; 43(2):302-311. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.04.009. View

17.

Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D . Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(27):5474-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002. View

18.

Fortier L, Chapman H, Pownder S, Roller B, Cross J, Cook J . BioCartilage Improves Cartilage Repair Compared With Microfracture Alone in an Equine Model of Full-Thickness Cartilage Loss. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(9):2366-74. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516648644. View

19.

Olubamiji A, Izadifar Z, Si J, Cooper D, Eames B, Chen D . Modulating mechanical behaviour of 3D-printed cartilage-mimetic PCL scaffolds: influence of molecular weight and pore geometry. Biofabrication. 2016; 8(2):025020. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025020. View

20.

Morris D, Mather M, Simon Jr C, Crowe J . Time-optimized X-ray micro-CT imaging of polymer based scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2011; 100(2):360-7. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31957. View