» Articles » PMID: 30275651

Simulation Experiences in Canadian Physiotherapy Programmes: A Description of Current Practices

Overview
Journal Physiother Can
Date 2018 Oct 3
PMID 30275651
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although health care professional education programmes around the world are increasingly using sophisticated simulation technology, the scope of simulation use in Canadian physiotherapy programmes is currently undefined. The current study explores the definitions of simulation, its current use, and the perceived benefits and barriers in Canadian entry-to-practice physiotherapy programmes. Using a qualitative, descriptive study approach, we contacted Canadian physiotherapy programmes to identify faculty members with simulation experience. Using a semi-structured interview format, we asked participants to discuss their perspectives of simulation in their physiotherapy programmes. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes. Of 13 eligible Canadian physiotherapy programmes, participants from 8 were interviewed. The interviews revealed three major themes: (1) variability in the definition of in simulation, (2) variability in simulation use, and (3) the benefits of and barriers to the use of simulation. Variability in the definition of in simulation among Canadian physiotherapy programmes is consistent with the current literature, highlighting a spectrum of complexity from low fidelity to high fidelity. Physiotherapy programmes are using a variety of simulations, with the aim of creating a bridge from theoretical knowledge to clinical practice. This study describes the starting point for characterizing simulation implementation in Canadian physiotherapy programmes and reflects the diversity that exists across the country.

Citing Articles

Computerized Simulation Education on Physiotherapy Students' Skills and Knowledge: A Systematic Review.

Rezayi S, Shahmoradi L, Ghotbi N, Choobsaz H, Yousefi M, Pourazadi S Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:4552974.

PMID: 36337839 PMC: 9629947. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4552974.


Clinician's Commentary on Melling et al.

Leger C Physiother Can. 2018; 70(3):272-273.

PMID: 30311916 PMC: 6158561. DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2017-11-cc.

References
1.
Watson K, Wright A, Morris N, McMeeken J, Rivett D, Blackstock F . Can simulation replace part of clinical time? Two parallel randomised controlled trials. Med Educ. 2012; 46(7):657-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04295.x. View

2.
Babyar S, Pivko S, Rosen E . Pedagogical tools to develop clinical reasoning: physical therapy students' perspective. J Allied Health. 2010; 39(3):e97-104. View

3.
Nunnink L, Venkatesh B, Krishnan A, Vidhani K, Udy A . A prospective comparison between written examination and either simulation-based or oral viva examination of intensive care trainees' procedural skills. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010; 38(5):876-82. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1003800511. View

4.
Blackstock F, Jull G . High-fidelity patient simulation in physiotherapy education. Aust J Physiother. 2007; 53(1):3-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(07)70056-9. View

5.
Blackstock F, Watson K, Morris N, Jones A, Wright A, McMeeken J . Simulation can contribute a part of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy clinical education: two randomized trials. Simul Healthc. 2012; 8(1):32-42. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318273101a. View