Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Spanish Bristol Foot Score (BFS-S)

Overview

Journal Aging Dis

Specialty Geriatrics

Date 2018 Oct 2

PMID 30271663

Citations 11

Authors

Emmanuel Navarro-Flores

Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias

Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo

Daniel Lopez-Lopez

Juan Manuel Vilar-Fernandez

Patricia Palomo-Lopez

Cesar Calvo-Lobo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The Bristol Foot Score is considered an instrument for measuring the impact of foot problems and pain. It was developed and validated in United Kingdom. Therefore, this aim was to perform the transcultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version. The recommended forward/backward translation protocol was applied for the procedure of translation, transcultural adaptation and validation to Spain. Considering each domain and question, internal consistency and reliability were analyzed through the Crombach alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A very good internal consistency was shown for the 3 domains: concern and pain showed a Cronbach of 0.896, footwear and general foot health of 0.790, mobility 0.887. Each question had a very good test-retest reliability, ranged from 0.721 to 0.963 with no systematic differences (P>0.05) in each question of the Spanish Bristol Foot Score (BFS-S) questionnaire. The test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC 95%): concern and foot pain 0.950 (0.913-0971); footwear and general foot health 0.914 (0.851-0.950), mobility 0.973 (0.953-0.984) and there were no sistematic differences in any domain (P > 0.05). The BFS-S was shown to be a valid and reliable tool with an acceptable use in the Spanish population.

Citing Articles

Psychometric assessment of the Chinese adaptation of the patient participation scale targeting inpatients: a validation research.

Zhao R, Huo M, Wang L, HuYan S, Li H, Cai Y Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1346131.

PMID: 38933591 PMC: 11199876. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1346131.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of Occupational LowBack Pain Prevention Behaviors Questionnaire Among Clinical Nurses: A Validation Study.

Zhang C, Yang Z, Zhang H Front Public Health. 2022; 10:827604.

PMID: 35400039 PMC: 8984022. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.827604.

Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis and Management of Synovial Fistula Associated Lateral Ankle Sprain or Instability: A Retrospective Study of 19 Surgically Confirmed Patients.

Kim J, Shim B, Yang J, Bat-Ulzii A, Cho J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(4).

PMID: 35206613 PMC: 8878007. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042428.

Effects of Nurse and Care Worker-led Foot-Care Program on Older People's Foot Conditions: Before and After Intervention Study.

Fujii K, Stolt M, Komoda T, Nishikawa M SAGE Open Nurs. 2022; 7:23779608211058492.

PMID: 35155772 PMC: 8832336. DOI: 10.1177/23779608211058492.

Gait Alterations in Adults after Ankle Fracture: A Systematic Review.

Mirando M, Conti C, Zeni F, Pedicini F, Nardone A, Pavese C Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(1).

PMID: 35054366 PMC: 8774579. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010199.

References

Jacobson N, Truax P . Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991; 59(1):12-9. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.1.12. View

Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M . Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3186-91. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. View

Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A . Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005; 8(2):94-104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x. View

Mickle K, Munro B, Lord S, Menz H, Steele J . Cross-sectional analysis of foot function, functional ability, and health-related quality of life in older people with disabling foot pain. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011; 63(11):1592-8. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20578. View

Bennett P, Patterson C, Wearing S, BAGLIONI T . Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998; 88(9):419-28. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-88-9-419. View

Scott N, Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bottomley A, de Graeff A, Groenvold M . The practical impact of differential item functioning analyses in a health-related quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res. 2009; 18(8):1125-30. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9521-z. View

Kaoulla P, Frescos N, Menz H . A survey of foot problems in community-dwelling older Greek Australians. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011; 4(1):23. PMC: 3212908. DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-4-23. View

Cuesta-Vargas A, Bennett P, Jimenez-Cebrian A, Labajos-Manzanares M . The psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2012; 22(7):1739-43. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0287-3. View

Landis J, Koch G . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1):159-74. View

10.

Altmann J . Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour. 1974; 49(3):227-67. DOI: 10.1163/156853974x00534. View

11.

Hawke F, Burns J . Understanding the nature and mechanism of foot pain. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009; 2:1. PMC: 2631512. DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-1. View

12.

Riskowski J, Hagedorn T, Hannan M . Measures of foot function, foot health, and foot pain: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Lower Limb Outcomes Assessment: Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FAM), Bristol Foot Score (BFS), Revised Foot Function Index (FFI-R), Foot Health Status.... Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012; 63 Suppl 11:S229-39. PMC: 4155931. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20554. View

13.

Rodriguez-Sanz D, Tovaruela-Carrion N, Lopez-Lopez D, Palomo-Lopez P, Romero-Morales C, Navarro-Flores E . Foot disorders in the elderly: A mini-review. Dis Mon. 2017; 64(3):64-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2017.08.001. View

14.

Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

15.

Walmsley S, Williams A, Ravey M, Graham A . The rheumatoid foot: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010; 3:12. PMC: 2914720. DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-12. View

16.

Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L, Grimby G, Thonnard J, Slade A . Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project. Med Care. 2004; 42(1 Suppl):I37-48. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000103529.63132.77. View

17.

Gijon-Nogueron G, Ndosi M, Luque-Suarez A, Alcacer-Pitarch B, Munuera P, Garrow A . Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index into Spanish. Qual Life Res. 2013; 23(2):571-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0507-5. View

18.

Jorgensen J, Andreasen J, Rathleff M . Translation and validation of the Danish Foot Function Index (FFI-DK). Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014; 25(4):e408-13. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12331. View

19.

Barnett S, Campbell R, Harvey I . The Bristol Foot Score: developing a patient-based foot-health measure. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005; 95(3):264-72. DOI: 10.7547/0950264. View

20.

Martinkevich P, Moller-Madsen B, Gottliebsen M, Kjeldgaard Pedersen L, Rahbek O . Validation of the translated Oxford ankle foot questionnaire in 82 Danish children aged between five and 16 years. Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B(3):420-6. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.34355. View