» Articles » PMID: 30267414

Distinct Effects of Daratumumab on Indirect and Direct Antiglobulin Tests: a New Method Employing 0.01 Mol/L Dithiothreitol for Negating the Daratumumab Interference with Preserving K Antigenicity (Osaka Method)

Overview
Journal Transfusion
Specialty Hematology
Date 2018 Sep 30
PMID 30267414
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is an increasing demand for daratumumab (DARA), an immunoglobulin (Ig)G1κ monoclonal antibody (MoAb) that recognizes CD38, to manage relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, DARA leads to positive and panreactive agglutination reactions in indirect antiglobulin tests (IATs) in vitro (the DARA interference). In addition, effects of DARA on red blood cells (RBCs) in vivo remains elusive.

Study Design And Methods: To develop a new method to negate the DARA interference, the effects of various concentrations of dithiothreitol (DTT) on RBC CD38 and Kell antigenicity in combination with an automatic blood cell washing centrifuge were compared with the AABB standard procedure in parallel. Moreover, direct antiglobulin tests (DATs) for RBCs in DARA-treated MM patients were examined.

Results: A quantity of 0.01 mol/L DTT as well as the AABB procedure (equivalent to 0.15 mol/L DTT in our procedure) markedly reduced the reactivity of phycoerythrin-mouse anti-CD38 MoAb and DARA with RBCs. In sharp contrast to the AABB procedure, 0.01 mol/L DTT partially preserved K antigenicity and allowed the determination of phenotype of K antigen even in the presence of the DARA interference. In contrast, DAT for RBCs obtained from MM patients showed a weak positive or negative reaction. Immunoblotting further indicated that DARA induced loss of CD38 in vivo.

Conclusion: A simple and reliable method to negate the DARA interference with partially preserving Kell antigenicity is proposed (Osaka method). CD38 antigenicity is susceptible to 0.01 mol/L DTT treatment even in the presence of DARA. Our data also demonstrate distinct effects of DARA on IAT in vitro and DAT in vivo.

Citing Articles

A Brief Report on Pre-Transfusion Testing in Patients Receiving the Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody for Hematological Disorders in India.

Biswas D, Basu D, Nag A, Kumar J, Datta S Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2024; 40(4):710-714.

PMID: 39469163 PMC: 11513064. DOI: 10.1007/s12288-024-01763-5.


Better resolving of anti-CD38 antibody interference with blood compatibility testing by using manual polybrene method compared with dithiothreitol-pretreatment indirect antiglobulin test.

Feng C, Chang C, Lien Z, Lin J, Chen T, Yeh S J Clin Lab Anal. 2023; 37(8):e24891.

PMID: 37161608 PMC: 10290224. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24891.


Overcoming Drug Interference in Transfusion Testing: A Spotlight on Daratumumab.

Nedumcheril M, DeSimone R, Racine-Brzostek S, Chaekal O, Vasovic L J Blood Med. 2021; 12:327-336.

PMID: 34079412 PMC: 8164699. DOI: 10.2147/JBM.S213510.


Antibody testing in patients treated with anti-CD38: there is still room for improvement.

Wagner F Blood Transfus. 2020; 18(4):244-246.

PMID: 32697927 PMC: 7375888. DOI: 10.2450/2020.0166-20.


New method for overcoming the interference produced by anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in compatibility testing.

Izaguirre E, Del Mar Luis-Hidalgo M, Gonzalez L, Arbona Castano C Blood Transfus. 2020; 18(4):290-294.

PMID: 32530397 PMC: 7375880. DOI: 10.2450/2020.0004-20.