» Articles » PMID: 30264374

Underestimation of Genital Lichen Sclerosus Incidence in Boys with Phimosis: Results from a Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2018 Sep 29
PMID 30264374
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Previous histological studies have shown a variable incidence of genital lichen sclerosus (LS). However, the results of these studies were inconsistent. To overcome the limitation of individual studies, we performed this systematic review to explore the true incidence of LS.

Methods: A comprehensive search of Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was performed including cross-referencing independently by two assessors.

Results: A total of 22 articles published from 1980 to 2017 were included in our study. The proportion of LS in those with phimosis had been described in many literature studies, ranging from 2 to 95%. The actual incidence of LS is thought to be clinically underestimated by as much as 50%.

Conclusions: The true incidence of LS in boys is more common than previously realized. LS may be observed in foreskin with or without phimosis. The presence of acquired phimosis may be an aggravating factor in the incidence of LS. The diagnosis LS must be based on biopsy for acquired phimosis because clinical findings underestimated the incidence of LS.

Citing Articles

Possible Role of NRF2 in Cell Response to OZOILE (Stable Ozonides) in Children Affected by Lichen Sclerosus of Foreskin.

Saija C, Curro M, Arena S, Bertuccio M, Cassaro F, Montalto A Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024; 46(9):9401-9414.

PMID: 39329909 PMC: 11429901. DOI: 10.3390/cimb46090557.


Penile lichen sclerosus, circumcision and sequelae, what are the questions?.

Morrel B, t Hoen L, Pasmans S Transl Androl Urol. 2022; 11(7):910-913.

PMID: 35958904 PMC: 9360517. DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-343.


Comparison of lichen sclerosus in boys and girls: A systematic literature review of epidemiology, symptoms, genetic background, risk factors, treatment, and prognosis.

Kumar K, Morrel B, van Hees C, van der Toorn F, van Dorp W, Mendels E Pediatr Dermatol. 2022; 39(3):400-408.

PMID: 35229894 PMC: 9545843. DOI: 10.1111/pde.14967.


Could a careful clinical examination distinguish physiologic phimosis from balanitis xerotica obliterans in children?.

Ghidini F, Virgone C, Pulvirenti R, Trovalusci E, Gamba P Eur J Pediatr. 2020; 180(2):591-595.

PMID: 33230719 PMC: 7813725. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-020-03881-4.


Penile intraepithelial neoplasia, penile cancer precursors and human papillomavirus prevalence in symptomatic preputium: a cross-sectional study of 351 circumcised men in Sweden.

Kristiansen S, Bjartling C, Svensson A, Forslund O, Torbrand C BJU Int. 2020; 127(4):428-434.

PMID: 32870593 PMC: 8247058. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15221.

References
1.
Jasaitiene D, Valiukeviciene S, Vaitkiene D, Jievaltas M, Barauskas V, Gudinaviciene I . Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in pediatric and adult male patients with congenital and acquired phimosis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2008; 44(6):460-6. View

2.
Azurdia R, Luzzi G, Byren I, Welsh K, Wojnarowska F, Marren P . Lichen sclerosus in adult men: a study of HLA associations and susceptibility to autoimmune disease. Br J Dermatol. 1999; 140(1):79-83. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02611.x. View

3.
Naji H, Jawad E, Ahmed H, Mustafa R . Histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision: Is it a waste of resources?. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2013; 10(2):164-6. DOI: 10.4103/0189-6725.115045. View

4.
Celis S, Reed F, Murphy F, Adams S, Gillick J, Abdelhafeez A . Balanitis xerotica obliterans in children and adolescents: a literature review and clinical series. J Pediatr Urol. 2013; 10(1):34-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.09.027. View

5.
Mattioli G, Repetto P, Carlini C, Granata C, Gambini C, Jasonni V . Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in children with phimosis and hypospadias. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002; 18(4):273-5. DOI: 10.1007/s003830100699. View