Reliability of the GAIN-SS, CRAFTT and PESQ Screening Instruments for Substance Use Among South African Adolescents

Overview

Journal S Afr J Psychiatr

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2018 Sep 29

PMID 30263165

Citations 1

Authors

Tara Carney

Bronwyn Myers

Johann Louw

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Screening for adolescent substance use can assist with the early identification of substance-related problems and guide the provision of appropriate services. As such, psychometrically sound screening tools are needed. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of the CRAFFT, Global Appraisal of Individual Needs-Short Screener (GAIN-SS) substance use subscale and Personal Experience Screening Questionnaire (PESQ) among adolescents from disadvantaged communities in Cape Town, South Africa.

Methods: Adolescents aged 12-19 years ( = 231) completed the three screeners at two points in time.

Results: Findings show that all three of the screeners had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach α ≥ 0.8). Test-retest reliability was similar for all three screeners, with intraclass correlation coefficient values slightly higher for the PESQ (0.82, 95% CI: 0.77-0.86) than for the GAIN-SS substance use subscale (0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84) and CRAFFT (0.76; 95% CI: 0.66-0.83). Kappa values indicated that the GAIN-SS substance use subscale and CRAFFT had moderate levels of agreement, while the PESQ had substantial levels of agreement for identifying those who had moderate or higher substance use risks at Time 1 and Time 2.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that all of these short screeners seem to have acceptable reliability when used in this population. All of the three screeners are appropriately reliable when used with adolescents from disadvantaged communities in Cape Town, but the PESQ performed slightly better. Future studies should also include the assessment of validity of these screeners in this context.

Citing Articles

Development of the Positive Outcomes through Supported Transition (POST) opioid preventive intervention for youth in the legal system: Study protocol for a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.

Brincks A, Haggerty K, Kolberg A, Albertson K, McCarty C, Kuklinski M Contemp Clin Trials. 2024; 149:107782.

PMID: 39706330 PMC: 11788021. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107782.

Adolescent alcohol consumption: protocol for a scoping review of screening and assessment tools used in Africa.

Briegal E, Biggane A, Obasi A Syst Rev. 2021; 10(1):100.

PMID: 33832510 PMC: 8033727. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01653-1.

References

Grenard J, Ames S, Wiers R, Thush C, Stacy A, Sussman S . Brief intervention for substance use among at-risk adolescents: a pilot study. J Adolesc Health. 2007; 40(2):188-91. PMC: 3134418. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.08.008. View

Rumpf H, Wohlert T, Freyer-Adam J, Grothues J, Bischof G . Screening questionnaires for problem drinking in adolescents: performance of AUDIT, AUDIT-C, CRAFFT and POSIT. Eur Addict Res. 2012; 19(3):121-7. DOI: 10.1159/000342331. View

Knight J, Sherritt L, Harris S, Gates E, Chang G . Validity of brief alcohol screening tests among adolescents: a comparison of the AUDIT, POSIT, CAGE, and CRAFFT. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003; 27(1):67-73. DOI: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000046598.59317.3A. View

Casey B, Getz S, Galvan A . The adolescent brain. Dev Rev. 2008; 28(1):62-77. PMC: 2500212. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.003. View

Dhalla S, Zumbo B, Poole G . A review of the psychometric properties of the CRAFFT instrument: 1999-2010. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2011; 4(1):57-64. DOI: 10.2174/1874473711104010057. View

Crews F, Boettiger C . Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009; 93(3):237-47. PMC: 2730661. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.04.018. View

Dennis M, Chan Y, Funk R . Development and validation of the GAIN Short Screener (GSS) for internalizing, externalizing and substance use disorders and crime/violence problems among adolescents and adults. Am J Addict. 2006; 15 Suppl 1:80-91. PMC: 5933850. DOI: 10.1080/10550490601006055. View

Subramaniam M, Cheok C, Verma S, Wong J, Chong S . Validity of a brief screening instrument-CRAFFT in a multiethnic Asian population. Addict Behav. 2010; 35(12):1102-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.004. View

Levy S, Sherritt L, Harris S, Gates E, Holder D, Kulig J . Test-retest reliability of adolescents' self-report of substance use. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004; 28(8):1236-41. DOI: 10.1097/01.alc.0000134216.22162.a5. View

10.

Brook J, Morojele N, Pahl K, Brook D . Predictors of drug use among South African adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2006; 38(1):26-34. PMC: 1592364. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.08.004. View

11.

Knight J, Sherritt L, Shrier L, Harris S, Chang G . Validity of the CRAFFT substance abuse screening test among adolescent clinic patients. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002; 156(6):607-14. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.156.6.607. View

12.

Erickson S, Gerstle M, Feldstein S . Brief interventions and motivational interviewing with children, adolescents, and their parents in pediatric health care settings: a review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005; 159(12):1173-80. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.159.12.1173. View

13.

Lubman D, Hides L, Yucel M, Toumbourou J . Intervening early to reduce developmentally harmful substance use among youth populations. Med J Aust. 2007; 187(S7):S22-5. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01331.x. View

14.

Tait R, Hulse G . A systematic review of the effectiveness of brief interventions with substance using adolescents by type of drug. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2004; 22(3):337-46. DOI: 10.1080/0959523031000154481. View

15.

Wachtel T, Staniford M . The effectiveness of brief interventions in the clinical setting in reducing alcohol misuse and binge drinking in adolescents: a critical review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19(5-6):605-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03060.x. View

16.

Winters K, Kaminer Y . Screening and assessing adolescent substance use disorders in clinical populations. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008; 47(7):740-4. PMC: 2765463. DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31817395cf. View

17.

Mitchell S, Gryczynski J, OGrady K, Schwartz R . SBIRT for adolescent drug and alcohol use: current status and future directions. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013; 44(5):463-72. PMC: 3602212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.11.005. View

18.

Saban A, Flisher A, Distiller G . Association between psychopathology and substance use among school-going adolescents in Cape Town, South Africa. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2011; 42(4):467-76. DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2010.10400709. View

19.

Hallgren K . Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012; 8(1):23-34. PMC: 3402032. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023. View

20.

McDonell M, Comtois K, Voss W, Morgan A, Ries R . Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Short Screener (GSS): psychometric properties and performance as a screening measure in adolescents. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2009; 35(3):157-60. DOI: 10.1080/00952990902825421. View