» Articles » PMID: 30259149

Analysis of Prognostic Factors of More/equal To10 years of Survival for Liver Cancer Patients After Liver Transplantation

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Sep 28
PMID 30259149
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate prognostic factors of  more than 10 years of survival for liver cancer patients after liver transplantation.

Methods: From May 2000 to May 2007, a total of 134 liver cancer patients who underwent liver transplantation in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, were continuously and retrospectively enrolled. The patients included 120 males and 14 females. There were 124 cases (92.5%) of primary hepatocellular carcinoma, 9 cases (6.7%) of cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 case of mixed hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with perioperative death were excluded. Follow-up was performed until May 31st, 2017 or the time of death. According to the data on postoperative survival time, patients were divided into a < 10 years group (81 cases) and a ≥ 10 years group (53 cases). Patients' clinical data were recorded and analyzed, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (≥ 400 µg/L or < 400 µg/L), number of tumor lesions (< 3 or ≥ 3), tumor size (≤ 5 cm or > 5 cm), vascular tumor thrombus (large blood vessel or non-large blood vessel), and histological differentiation degree. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates. The log-rank method was used to compare the differences between survival curves. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to perform multivariate analyses of possibly influential factors.

Results: (1) Follow-up was conducted with all 134 liver cancer patients after liver transplantation. The follow-up periods were 1-201 months, with a median of 18 (8.75, 132.5) months. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis results showed that the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year cumulative survival rates were 70.3%, 48.6%, 46.8%, and 46.8%, respectively. (2) The differences in the age of patients, the incidence rate of AFP ≥ 400 µg/L, tumor histological differentiation, vascular tumor thrombi, tumor lesion size, and number of tumor lesions between two groups were all statistically significant (all P < 0.01). (3) The cumulative survival rates were different in AFP (log-rank χ = 13.428), histopathologic differentiation (log-rank χ = 33.592), large blood vessel tumor thrombi (log-rank χ = 36.470), tumor lesion size (log-rank χ = 39.835), and number of tumor lesions (log-rank χ = 47.016), and there were statistically significant differences between groups (all P < 0.01). (4) Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses showed that ≥ 3 tumor lesions [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.879, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.566-5.422], tumor lesion size > 5 cm (HR = 2.682, 95% CI 1.382-5.366), large blood vessel tumor thrombi (HR = 1.831, 95% CI 1.010-3.341), and poor histological differentiation (HR = 2.150, 95% CI 1.372-3.394), were risk factors affecting the 10-year survival of liver cancer patients after liver transplantation (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Tumor size, tumor number, large blood vessel tumor thrombi, and low tumor differentiation were all found to be independent risk factors affecting the 10-year survival rate after liver transplantation in liver cancer patients.

Citing Articles

Convergence of nanotechnology and artificial intelligence in the fight against liver cancer: a comprehensive review.

Bhange M, Telange D Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):77.

PMID: 39841330 PMC: 11754566. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-01821-y.


The role of CXCL8 and CCNB1 in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma in the context of cirrhosis: implications for early detection and immune-based therapies.

Sun Q, An R, Li J, Liu C, Wang M, Wang C J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(13):11471-11489.

PMID: 37391641 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05004-6.


The Roles of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Parameters in Preoperative Evaluation of Pathological Grades and Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Wang F, Yan C, Wang C, Yang Y, Zhang D Front Oncol. 2022; 12:884854.

PMID: 35646649 PMC: 9131658. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.884854.


Comparison of 10-Year Survival Outcomes for Early Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma following Different Treatments.

Meng F, Zhang H, Peng H, Lu S Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021:6638117.

PMID: 34150908 PMC: 8197669. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6638117.


Bridging and downstaging role of trans-arterial radio-embolization for expected small remnant volume before liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Shehta A, Lee J, Suh K, Kim H, Hong S, Cho J Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2020; 24(4):421-430.

PMID: 33234744 PMC: 7691198. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2020.24.4.421.


References
1.
Doyle M, Vachharajani N, Maynard E, Shenoy S, Anderson C, Wellen J . Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results suggest excellent outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 215(1):19-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.02.022. View

2.
Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, MacIntyre M . The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015; 1(4):505-27. PMC: 4500822. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735. View

3.
Zhang H, Yuan S, Dai S, Zhang J, Huang X, Lu C . Tumor size does not independently affect long-term survival after curative resection of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma without macroscopic vascular invasion. World J Surg. 2013; 38(4):947-57. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2365-2. View

4.
Hameed B, Mehta N, Sapisochin G, Roberts J, Yao F . Alpha-fetoprotein level > 1000 ng/mL as an exclusion criterion for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria. Liver Transpl. 2014; 20(8):945-51. PMC: 4807739. DOI: 10.1002/lt.23904. View

5.
Bhoori S, Mazzaferro V . Current challenges in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014; 28(5):867-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.08.001. View