» Articles » PMID: 30258393

Smoothness Metrics in Complex Movement Tasks

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Sep 28
PMID 30258393
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Smoothness is a main characteristic of goal-directed human movements. The suitability of approaches quantifying movement smoothness is dependent on the analyzed signal's structure. Recently, activities of daily living (ADL) received strong interest in research on aging and neurorehabilitation. Such tasks have complex signal structures and kinematic parameters need to be adapted. In the present study we examined four different approaches to quantify movement smoothness in ADL. We tested the appropriateness of these approaches, namely the number of velocity peaks per meter (NoP), the spectral arc length (SAL), the speed metric (SM) and the log dimensionless jerk (LDJ), by comparing movement signals from eight healthy elderly (67.1a ± 7.1a) with eight healthy young (26.9a ± 2.1a) participants performing an activity of daily living (making a cup of tea). All approaches were able to identify group differences in smoothness (Cohen's d NoP = 2.53, SAL = 1.95, SM = 1.69, LDJ = 4.19), three revealed high to very high sensitivity (z-scores: NoP = 1.96 ± 0.55, SAL = 1.60 ± 0.64, SM = 3.41 ± 3.03, LDJ = 5.28 ± 1.52), three showed low within-group variance (NoP = 0.72, SAL = 0.60, SM = 0.11, LDJ = 0.71), two showed strong correlations between the first and the second half of the task execution (intra-trial Rs: NoP = 0.22 n.s., SAL = 0.33, SM = 0.36, LDJ = 0.91), and one was independent of other kinematic parameters (SM), while three showed strong models of multiple linear regression (Rs: NoP = 0.61, SAL = 0.48, LDJ = 0.70). Based on our results we make suggestion toward use examined smoothness measures. In total the log dimensionless jerk proved to be the most appropriate in ADL, as long as trial durations are controlled.

Citing Articles

The association of upper limb sensorimotor capacity, everyday inpatient behavior, and the effects of neurorehabilitation in persons with multiple sclerosis and stroke: a mixed-design study.

Gulde P, Vojta H, Schmidle S, Rieckmann P, Hermsdorfer J J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):49.

PMID: 40045323 PMC: 11884105. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01586-z.


Standardizing surgical training with objective performance indicators: a prospective cohort study.

Choksi S, Ballo M, Profant C, Portelli K, Dhar V, Schmidt R Surg Endosc. 2025; .

PMID: 39953278 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-11599-3.


Role and modulation of various spinal pathways for human upper limb control in different gravity conditions.

Bruel A, Bacha L, Boehly E, De Trogoff C, Represa L, Courtine G PLoS Comput Biol. 2025; 21(1):e1012069.

PMID: 39761279 PMC: 11737853. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012069.


Movement Diversity and Complexity Increase as Arm Impairment Decreases After Stroke: Quality of Movement Experience as a Possible Target for Wearable Feedback.

Okita S, Schwerz de Lucena D, Reinkensmeyer D IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024; 32:2961-2970.

PMID: 39110555 PMC: 11500827. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3439669.


Measurement properties of movement smoothness metrics for upper limb reaching movements in people with moderate to severe subacute stroke.

Cornec G, Lempereur M, Mensah-Gourmel J, Robertson J, Miramand L, Medee B J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):90.

PMID: 38812037 PMC: 11134951. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01382-1.


References
1.
Cruse H, Wischmeyer E, Bruwer M, Brockfeld P, Dress A . On the cost functions for the control of the human arm movement. Biol Cybern. 1990; 62(6):519-28. DOI: 10.1007/BF00205114. View

2.
Baur B, Furholzer W, Jasper I, Marquardt C, Hermsdorfer J . Effects of modified pen grip and handwriting training on writer's cramp. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90(5):867-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.015. View

3.
Poston B, Van Gemmert A, Barduson B, Stelmach G . Movement structure in young and elderly adults during goal-directed movements of the left and right arm. Brain Cogn. 2008; 69(1):30-8. PMC: 2663567. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.05.002. View

4.
Hermsdorfer J, Hentze S, Goldenberg G . Spatial and kinematic features of apraxic movement depend on the mode of execution. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44(10):1642-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.023. View

5.
Alt Murphy M, Willen C, Sunnerhagen K . Responsiveness of upper extremity kinematic measures and clinical improvement during the first three months after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013; 27(9):844-53. DOI: 10.1177/1545968313491008. View