» Articles » PMID: 30257673

Layer-specific Strain Analysis in Patients with Suspected Stable Angina Pectoris and Apparently Normal Left Ventricular Wall Motion

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Sep 28
PMID 30257673
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Non-invasive imaging tests are widely used in the evaluation of stable angina pectoris (SAP). Despite these tests, non-significant coronary lesions are not a rare finding in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography (CAG). Two-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking global longitudinal strain (GLS) imaging is a more sensitive and accurate technique for measuring LV function than conventional 2D methods. Layer-specific strain analysis is a relatively new method that provides endocardial and epicardial myocardial layer assessment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate longitudinal layer-specific strain (LSS) imaging in patients with suspected SAP.

Methods: Patients who underwent CAG for SAP were retrospectively screened. A total of 79 patients with no history of heart disease and wall motion abnormalities were included in the study. Forty-three patients with coronary lesions > 70% constituted the coronary artery disease (CAD) group and 36 patients without significant CAD constituted the control group. Layer-specific GLS transmural, endocardium, and epicardium values (GLS-trans, GLS-endo, and GLS-epi, respectively) were compared between the groups.

Results: Patients in the CAD group had significantly lower GLS values in all layers (GLS-trans: -18.2 + 2.4% vs -22.2 + 2.2% p < .001; GLS-endo: -20.8 + 2.8% vs -25.3 + 2.6%, p < .001; GLS-epi: 15.9 + 2.4% vs -19.5 + 1.9%, p < .001). Multivariate adjustment demonstrated GLS-trans as the only independent predictor of CAD [OR:0.472, CI (0.326-0.684), p < .001]. Additionally, the GLS values were all lower in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) true-positive patients compared with MPS false-positive patients (GLS-trans: -17.7 ± 2.4 vs. -21.9 ± 2.4%, p < .001; GLS-endo: -20.2 ± 2.9% vs -24.9 ± 2.9%, P < .001; GLS-epi: 15.4 ± 2.6% vs. -19.2 ± 1.8%, P < .001).

Conclusion: Resting layer-specific strain as assessed by 2D speckle tracking analysis demonstrated that GLS values were reduced in all layers of myocardium with SAP and with no wall motion abnormalities. LSS analysis can improve the identification of patients with significant CAD but further prospective larger scale studies are needed to put forth the incremental value of LSS analysis over transmural GLS.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the Left Ventricular Myocardium Using Layer-Specific Strain Analysis in Adolescent Athletes Performing High-Intensity Interval Training.

Kosemen D, Cetin S, Demirci D, Babaoglu K Pediatr Cardiol. 2024; 45(4):770-779.

PMID: 38347232 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-024-03411-1.


The clinical application of longitudinal layer specific strain as a diagnostic and prognostic instrument in ischemic heart diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sharma S, Lassen M, Nielsen A, Skaarup K, Biering-Sorensen T Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:980626.

PMID: 37051064 PMC: 10083306. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.980626.


Evaluation of left ventricular systolic function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using ultrasonic layer-specific strain technology and its association with cardiovascular events: a long-term follow-up study.

Zhang H, Yang C, Gao F, Hu S, Ma H Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2022; 20(1):25.

PMID: 36207759 PMC: 9541079. DOI: 10.1186/s12947-022-00295-0.


Myocardial strain analysis as a non-invasive screening test in the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease.

Akiash N, Mohammadi M, Mombeini H, Nikpajouh A Egypt Heart J. 2021; 73(1):49.

PMID: 34032936 PMC: 8149515. DOI: 10.1186/s43044-021-00173-6.


Impact of the left anterior descending artery wrapping around the left ventricular apex on cardiac mechanics in patients with normal coronary angiography.

Badran H, Ibrahim W, Alaksher T, Soltan G Egypt Heart J. 2020; 72(1):33.

PMID: 32495302 PMC: 7270221. DOI: 10.1186/s43044-020-00059-z.

References
1.
Alcidi G, Esposito R, Evola V, Santoro C, Lembo M, Sorrentino R . Normal reference values of multilayer longitudinal strain according to age decades in a healthy population: A single-centre experience. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 19(12):1390-1396. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jex306. View

2.
Stankovic I, Putnikovic B, Cvjetan R, Milicevic P, Panic M, Kalezic-Radmili T . Visual assessment vs. strain imaging for the detection of critical stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery in patients without a history of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 16(4):402-9. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu206. View

3.
Liu C, Li J, Ren M, Wang Z, Li Z, Gao F . Multilayer longitudinal strain at rest may help to predict significant stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery in patients with suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 32(12):1675-1685. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-0959-0. View

4.
Farsalinos K, Daraban A, Unlu S, Thomas J, Badano L, Voigt J . Head-to-Head Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements among Nine Different Vendors: The EACVI/ASE Inter-Vendor Comparison Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28(10):1171-1181, e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.06.011. View

5.
Zhang L, Wu W, Ma H, Wang H . Usefulness of layer-specific strain for identifying complex CAD and predicting the severity of coronary lesions in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: Compared with Syntax score. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 223:1045-1052. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.277. View