» Articles » PMID: 30255251

Extent of Enhancement on Multiphase Contrast-enhanced CT Images is a Potential Prognostic Factor of Stage I-III Colon Cancer

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Sep 27
PMID 30255251
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: By evaluating extent of tumour enhancement on preoperative contrast-enhanced MDCT, we aimed to establish an imaging-based model to predict cancer-specific survival in stage I-III colon cancer.

Methods: A total of 548 stage I-III colon cancer patients who underwent curative resection from 2007 to 2013 were retrospectively included and divided into primary cohort and validation cohort according to admission time. The attenuation coefficient of each colon cancer was measured on the workstation by drawing the ROI in CT images. The enhancement ratio was calculated using maximum tumour attenuation value in triphasic MDCT scanning divided by the minimum. Patients were divided into low/high-enhancement groups according to the optimal cut-off value derived from time-dependent ROC curve. Kaplan-Meier method and COX regression analysis were adopted to evaluate prognostic value of variables. A nomogram for prognosis was conducted on the basis of a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.

Results: No significant differences were observed in age, sex, pTNM stage, perioperative chemoradiotherapy, serum CEA, tumour size, tumour localisation and histologic type between low- and high-enhancement groups. The high-enhancement group had a significantly shorter cancer-specific survival rate (69.5%) than the low-enhancement group (85.9%) (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that high-enhancement state was closely associated with increased risk of colon cancer mortality in stage I (p = 0.033), stage II (p = 0.002) and stage III (p = 0.014). Cox regression analysis indicated the extent of enhancement was an independent prognostic factor (HR 2.258, 95% CI 1.476-3.455; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The extent of tumour enhancement on MDCT can serve as a potential risk factor for stage I-III colon cancer.

Key Points: • Survival rates of stage I-III colon cancer vary widely even within the same stage. • Prognostic value of the extent of tumour enhancement on MDCT was assessed. • The high-enhancement group had a significantly shorter cancer-specific survival rate.

Citing Articles

Baseline radiologic features as predictors of efficacy in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases receiving surufatinib.

Zhang J, Zhu H, Shen L, Li J, Zhang X, Bai C Chin J Cancer Res. 2023; 35(5):526-535.

PMID: 37969958 PMC: 10643338. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.05.09.


A prognostic nomogram for predicting recurrence-free survival of stage I-III colon cancer based on immune-infiltrating Treg-related genes.

Xu L, Liu M, Lian J, Li E, Dongmin C, Li X J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(15):13523-13543.

PMID: 37498396 PMC: 10590341. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05187-y.


18F-FDG PET/CT Image Deep Learning Predicts Colon Cancer Survival.

Tian M, Li Y, Chen H Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2023; 2023:2986379.

PMID: 37181405 PMC: 10175011. DOI: 10.1155/2023/2986379.


Effects of Nutritious Meal Combined with Online Publicity and Education on Postoperative Nutrition and Psychological State in Patients with Low Rectal Cancer After Colostomy.

Qu L, Zhou M, Yu Y, Li K Comput Math Methods Med. 2022; 2022:1541385.

PMID: 35799641 PMC: 9256354. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1541385.


Tumor size measured by multidetector CT in resectable colon cancer: correlation with regional lymph node metastasis and N stage.

Mou A, Li H, Chen X, Fan Y, Pu H World J Surg Oncol. 2021; 19(1):179.

PMID: 34134714 PMC: 8210336. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02292-5.


References
1.
Miles K . Tumour angiogenesis and its relation to contrast enhancement on computed tomography: a review. Eur J Radiol. 1999; 30(3):198-205. DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(99)00012-1. View

2.
Altman D, Royston P . What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?. Stat Med. 2000; 19(4):453-73. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::aid-sim350>3.0.co;2-5. View

3.
Gill S, Loprinzi C, Sargent D, Thome S, Alberts S, Haller D . Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much?. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(10):1797-806. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.059. View

4.
Andre T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L, Navarro M, Tabernero J, Hickish T . Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(23):2343-51. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032709. View

5.
Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria S, Macapinlac H, Burgess M, Patel S . Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(13):1753-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.3049. View