» Articles » PMID: 30254890

Effect of Different Ectopic Pregnancy Treatments on Cryopreserved Embryo Transfer Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Date 2018 Sep 27
PMID 30254890
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of different treatment methods for previous ectopic pregnancies (EP) on cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET) outcomes.

Materials And Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with EP histories were divided into four groups based on their previous EP treatments: Group 1-unilateral tubal removal; Group: 2-bilateral tubal removal or unilateral tubal removal with contralateral tubal ligation; Group: 3-conservative surgery group; and Group 4-conservative medication group. A total of 1333 women with previous histories of being admitted to the hospital for CET treatment were consecutively enrolled between January 2009 and December 2014.

Results: Patients who underwent bilateral tubal ligation or removal had a lower miscarriage rate [8.88% vs. 3.46%, = 0.006, odds ratio = 2.718, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.301-5.677] than those who underwent unilateral tubal removal. No significant difference was observed in the rate of EP after CET in the four groups in women with EP histories. ( = 0.258, 95%CI = 0.113-1.836; = 0.137, 95%CI = 0.975-0.997; = 0.314, 95%CI = 0.987-1.001; = 0.198, 95%CI = 0.987-1.001). The groups were not different with regard to other pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference among EP treatment methods with regard to their impacts on CET outcomes in women with EP histories. Bilateral tubal ligation or removal surgery can decrease the miscarriage rate after CET.

Citing Articles

Factors Associated with Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancy: A 10-Year Review at a District Hospital in Ghana.

Sefogah P, Oduro N, Swarray-Deen A, Nuamah H, Takyi R, Nuamah M Obstet Gynecol Int. 2022; 2022:1491419.

PMID: 35295562 PMC: 8920631. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1491419.

References
1.
Fernandez H, Capmas P, Lucot J, Resch B, Panel P, Bouyer J . Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(5):1247-53. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det037. View

2.
Weigert M, Gruber D, Pernicka E, Bauer P, Feichtinger W . Previous tubal ectopic pregnancy raises the incidence of repeated ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008; 26(1):13-7. PMC: 2649331. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-008-9278-2. View

3.
Mesogitis S, Daskalakis G, Antsaklis A, Papantoniou N, Papageorgiou J, Michalas S . Local application of methotrexate for ectopic pregnancy with a percutaneous puncturing technique. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1998; 45(3):154-8. DOI: 10.1159/000009946. View

4.
Pantoja M, Fernandes A . Indications for in vitro fertilization at a public center for reproductive health in Campinas, Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014; 128(1):14-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.022. View

5.
de Bennetot M, Rabischong B, Aublet-Cuvelier B, Belard F, Fernandez H, Bouyer J . Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(5):1271-6.e1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.041. View