A Survey of the Prevalence and Practice Patterns of Human Acellular Nerve Allograft Use

Overview

Journal Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open

Specialty General Surgery

Date 2018 Sep 27

PMID 30254826

Citations 4

Authors

Solomon M Azouz

Heather D Lucas

Raman C Mahabir

Shelley S Noland

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: There have been many technical and scientific advances over the last decade in peripheral nerve surgery. Human acellular nerve graft (HANA) has become increasingly popular but current practice patterns among hand surgeons have yet to be defined. Coding practices may not have kept up with this innovation. A 26 question survey of hand surgeons was performed to evaluate the adoption of HANA, and current coding and billing practices. The survey was sent to hand surgeons trained in orthopedic, plastic, general, and neuro surgery. The survey was designed and implemented by the Mayo Clinic Survey Center.

Results: Four hundred sixty-one responses to the survey were received. Most respondents currently use HANA (70%). Of those surgeons who do use HANA, nearly all use it less than 10 times per month (98%). There was no significant difference in the use of HANA across different specialties. There was a significant difference in HANA use depending on practice type with higher use by those in group private practice (57%) compared with academic practice (28%), solo practice (12%), and other practice environment (3%). There was a significant difference in HANA use depending on the number of years in practice. Those in practice less than 5 years used HANA the most (32%), followed by > 20 years in practice (27%), 6-10 years in practice (16%), 16-20 years in practice (14%), and 11-15 years in practice (11%). When asked the Current Procedural Terminology code they would use to bill for the procedure of choice, the most common response was 64910 (nerve repair with synthetic conduit or vein allograft).

Conclusions: HANA has surpassed nerve conduit as the traditional gold standard in our study with nearly 70% of hand surgeons using HANA in their practice and a greater percentage of respondents choosing HANA as their first choice to repair as compared with nerve conduit, nerve autograft, or vein graft. There remains confusion regarding appropriate billing practices for the use of HANA. Due to its common use, a Current Procedural Terminology code should specifically designated for the use of HANA in the hand.

Citing Articles

Development and in vitro evaluation of biomimetic injectable hydrogels from decellularized human nerves for central nervous system regeneration.

Agarwal G, Moes K, Schmidt C Mater Today Bio. 2025; 31:101483.

PMID: 39896276 PMC: 11787433. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101483.

Biohacking Nerve Repair: Novel Biomaterials, Local Drug Delivery, Electrical Stimulation, and Allografts to Aid Surgical Repair.

Crabtree J, Mulenga C, Tran K, Feinberg K, Santerre J, Borschel G Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39199733 PMC: 11352148. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080776.

Acellular nerve xenografts based on supercritical extraction technology for repairing long-distance sciatic nerve defects in rats.

Wei S, Hu Q, Ma J, Dai X, Sun Y, Han G Bioact Mater. 2022; 18:300-320.

PMID: 35387172 PMC: 8961471. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.014.

Restoration of Neurological Function Following Peripheral Nerve Trauma.

Kuffler D, Foy C Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(5).

PMID: 32155716 PMC: 7084579. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21051808.

Advances in the repair of segmental nerve injuries and trends in reconstruction.

Pan D, Mackinnon S, Wood M Muscle Nerve. 2019; 61(6):726-739.

PMID: 31883129 PMC: 7230025. DOI: 10.1002/mus.26797.

References

Chiu D, Strauch B . A prospective clinical evaluation of autogenous vein grafts used as a nerve conduit for distal sensory nerve defects of 3 cm or less. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990; 86(5):928-34. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199011000-00015. View

Guo Y, Chen G, Tian G, Tapia C . Sensory recovery following decellularized nerve allograft transplantation for digital nerve repair. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013; 47(6):451-3. DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.778862. View

Colen K, Choi M, Chiu D . Nerve grafts and conduits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124(6 Suppl):e386-e394. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf8430. View

Means Jr K, Rinker B, Higgins J, Payne Jr S, Merrell G, Wilgis E . A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Pilot Study of Outcomes for Digital Nerve Repair in the Hand Using Hollow Conduit Compared With Processed Allograft Nerve. Hand (N Y). 2016; 11(2):144-51. PMC: 4920529. DOI: 10.1177/1558944715627233. View

Spinner R, Shin A, Bishop A . Advances in the Repair of Peripheral Nerve Injury. Neurosurgery. 2015; 62 Suppl 1:146-51. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000814. View

Isaacs J, Browne T . Overcoming short gaps in peripheral nerve repair: conduits and human acellular nerve allograft. Hand (N Y). 2014; 9(2):131-7. PMC: 4022952. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9601-6. View

Rivlin M, Sheikh E, Isaac R, Beredjiklian P . The role of nerve allografts and conduits for nerve injuries. Hand Clin. 2010; 26(3):435-46, viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2010.04.010. View

Strauch B, Ferder M, Moore K, Kim D, Llena J . Determining the maximal length of a vein conduit used as an interposition graft for nerve regeneration. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1996; 12(8):521-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1006624. View

Belen D, Aciduman A, Er U . History of peripheral nerve repair: may the procedure have been practiced in Hippocratic School?. Surg Neurol. 2008; 72(2):190-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2008.03.030. View

10.

Karabekmez F, Duymaz A, Moran S . Early clinical outcomes with the use of decellularized nerve allograft for repair of sensory defects within the hand. Hand (N Y). 2009; 4(3):245-9. PMC: 2724628. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-009-9195-6. View

11.

Safa B, Buncke G . Autograft Substitutes: Conduits and Processed Nerve Allografts. Hand Clin. 2016; 32(2):127-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2015.12.012. View

12.

Lin M, Manzano G, Gupta R . Nerve allografts and conduits in peripheral nerve repair. Hand Clin. 2013; 29(3):331-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.04.003. View

13.

Brooks D, Weber R, Chao J, Rinker B, Zoldos J, Robichaux M . Processed nerve allografts for peripheral nerve reconstruction: a multicenter study of utilization and outcomes in sensory, mixed, and motor nerve reconstructions. Microsurgery. 2011; 32(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1002/micr.20975. View

14.

Sebastin S, Chung K . A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128(3):723-737. PMC: 3163033. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318221dc83. View

15.

Wang G, Lu S, Kuang Z, Peng J, Guo Q, Ji H . [Experimental study on promotion of neurotropic reinnervation with chemically extracted acellular nerve allograft]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011; 24(11):1288-92. View

16.

Rbia N, Shin A . The Role of Nerve Graft Substitutes in Motor and Mixed Motor/Sensory Peripheral Nerve Injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42(5):367-377. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.02.017. View

17.

Badoiu S, Lascar I, Enescu D . Peripheral nerve allografting - why and how?. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2014; 109(5):584-9. View

18.

Taras J, Amin N, Patel N, McCabe L . Allograft reconstruction for digital nerve loss. J Hand Surg Am. 2013; 38(10):1965-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.07.008. View

19.

Rinker B, Zoldos J, Weber R, Ko J, Thayer W, Greenberg J . Use of Processed Nerve Allografts to Repair Nerve Injuries Greater Than 25 mm in the Hand. Ann Plast Surg. 2017; 78(6S Suppl 5):S292-S295. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001037. View

20.

Tang P, Chauhan A . Decellular Nerve Allografts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23(11):641-7. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00373. View