» Articles » PMID: 30250428

Neural Field Theory of Corticothalamic Prediction With Control Systems Analysis

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Sep 26
PMID 30250428
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neural field theory is used to model and analyze realistic corticothalamic responses to simple visual stimuli. This yields system transfer functions that embody key features in common with those of engineering control systems, which enables interpretation of brain dynamics in terms of data filters. In particular, these features assist in finding internal signals that represent input stimuli and their changes, which are exactly the types of quantities used in control systems to enable prediction of future input signals, and adjustment of gains which is argued to be the analog of attention in control theory. Corticothalamic dynamics are shown to be analogous to the classical proportional-integral-derivative (PID) filters that are widely used in engineering.

Citing Articles

Unified theory of alpha, mu, and tau rhythms via eigenmodes of brain activity.

El Zghir R, Gabay N, Robinson P Front Comput Neurosci. 2024; 18:1335130.

PMID: 39286332 PMC: 11403587. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1335130.


Neural field theory of adaptive effects on auditory evoked responses and mismatch negativity in multifrequency stimulus sequences.

Babaie-Janvier T, Gabay N, McInnes A, Robinson P Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 17:1282924.

PMID: 38234595 PMC: 10791997. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1282924.


Neural Field Theory of Evoked Response Sequences and Mismatch Negativity With Adaptation.

Robinson P, Gabay N, Babaie-Janvier T Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:655505.

PMID: 34483860 PMC: 8415526. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.655505.


Determination of Dynamic Brain Connectivity via Spectral Analysis.

Robinson P, Henderson J, Gabay N, Aquino K, Babaie-Janvier T, Gao X Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:655576.

PMID: 34335207 PMC: 8323754. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.655576.


Modal-Polar Representation of Evoked Response Potentials in Multiple Arousal States.

El-Zghir R, Gabay N, Robinson P Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:642479.

PMID: 34163339 PMC: 8215109. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.642479.


References
1.
Pouget A, Beck J, Ma W, Latham P . Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns. Nat Neurosci. 2013; 16(9):1170-8. PMC: 4487650. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3495. View

2.
Rowe D, Robinson P, Rennie C . Estimation of neurophysiological parameters from the waking EEG using a biophysical model of brain dynamics. J Theor Biol. 2004; 231(3):413-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.07.004. View

3.
Daunizeau J, den Ouden H, Pessiglione M, Kiebel S, Friston K, Stephan K . Observing the observer (II): deciding when to decide. PLoS One. 2010; 5(12):e15555. PMC: 3001882. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015555. View

4.
Spekreijse H, VAN DER TWELL L, Zuidema T . Contrast evoked responses in man. Vision Res. 1973; 13(8):1577-601. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90016-3. View

5.
Friston K . The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010; 11(2):127-38. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2787. View