5-Year Outcomes of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The CoreValve U.S. Pivotal High Risk Trial was the first randomized trial to show superior 1-year mortality of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) among high operative mortality-risk patients.
Objectives: The authors sought to compare TAVR to SAVR for mid-term 5-year outcomes of safety, performance, and durability.
Methods: Surgical high-risk patients were randomized (1:1) to TAVR with the self-expanding bioprosthesis or SAVR. VARC-1 (Valve Academic Research Consortium I) definitions were applied. Severe hemodynamic structural valve deterioration was defined as a mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg or a change in gradient ≥20 mm Hg or new severe aortic regurgitation. Five-year follow-up was planned.
Results: A total of 797 patients were randomized at 45 U.S. centers, of whom 750 underwent an attempted implant (TAVR = 391, SAVR = 359). The overall mean age was 83 years, and the STS score was 7.4%. All-cause mortality rates at 5 years were 55.3% for TAVR and 55.4% for SAVR. Subgroup analysis showed no differences in mortality. Major stroke rates were 12.3% for TAVR and 13.2% for SAVR. Mean aortic valve gradients were 7.1 ± 3.6 mm Hg for TAVR and 10.9 ± 5.7 mm Hg for SAVR. No clinically significant valve thrombosis was observed. Freedom from severe SVD was 99.2% for TAVR and 98.3% for SAVR (p = 0.32), and freedom from valve reintervention was 97.0% for TAVR and 98.9% for SAVR (p = 0.04). A permanent pacemaker was implanted in 33.0% of TAVR and 19.8% of SAVR patients at 5 years.
Conclusions: This study shows similar mid-term survival and stroke rates in high-risk patients following TAVR or SAVR. Severe structural valve deterioration and valve reinterventions were uncommon. (Safety and Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve System in the Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis in High Risk and Very High Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement; NCT01240902).
Precision medicine in the management of valvular heart disease.
Nettersheim F, Baldus S Herz. 2025; .
PMID: 40035804 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-025-05299-w.
Neethling W, Forster G, Meduri C, Meuris B, Asgar A, Sellers S Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1512961.
PMID: 39991635 PMC: 11842446. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1512961.
Sato Y, Torii S, Kawai K, Yahagi K, Kutyna M, Kawakami R Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025; 18(2):e014523.
PMID: 39965045 PMC: 11827688. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014523.
Contemporary Management of the Aortic Valve-Narrative Review of an Evolving Landscape.
Lella S, Ferrell B, Sugiura T J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.
PMID: 39797217 PMC: 11722002. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010134.
Pfenniger A, Stolte T, Reichl J, Leibundgut G, Wagener M, Kaiser C Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024; 40(2):362-377.
PMID: 39695013 DOI: 10.1007/s12928-024-01074-6.