» Articles » PMID: 30249292

Completion Rates and Psychosocial Intervention Effectiveness in an Australian Substance Use Therapeutic Community

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2018 Sep 26
PMID 30249292
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Program attrition is a major problem in substance use treatment. It is not clear which client and treatment variables are related to successful completion. This study aimed to identify client variables associated with Therapeutic Community (TC) completion. A secondary aim was to investigate changes in entry and exit scores on psychosocial outcome measures.

Methods: Retrospective quantitative analysis of data collected from 193 Australian TC residents, over 3.5 years. Variables measured included: demographics; Depression, Anxiety, Stress Score (DASS-21) and World Health Organisation Quality of Life 8 questions (WHOQOL-8).

Results: Completion rates were 30.6%. High Money WHOQOL-8 scores, suggestive of minimal financial stressors, positively predicted completion. Multivariate analyses showed that negative predictors of completion were: amphetamine being primary substance of concern, aggression, high Relationship WHOQOL-8 scores, suggestive of positive relationships, and younger or older age. Those in the program demonstrated clinically significant psychological improvement and significant improvement in all quality of life scores over time. The degree of psychometric improvement was most pronounced in those who completed the course, with the exception of depression, stress, and money problems.

Conclusion: The findings provide an understanding of specific predictors of program completion which may help to identify high-risk clients and inform program improvement. Early attrition rates may be reduced by monitoring and supporting high-risk clients. Overall, psychometric improvement occurred amongst both completers and non-completers overtime but is most prominent amongst course completers, with the exception of depression, stress, and money problems. Future research could potentially focus on amphetamine users and shortened TC programs, focusing on acute psychosocial intervention.

Citing Articles

A Web-Based Patient Empowerment to Medication Adherence Program for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lim S, Athilingam P, Lahiri M, Cheung P, He H, Lopez V JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e48079.

PMID: 37930758 PMC: 10660247. DOI: 10.2196/48079.


Gender and Age Bias in the Evaluation of Suicide Attempt Behavior in an Emergency Department.

Han N, Jeong S, Lee S, Kong S Community Ment Health J. 2023; 59(8):1521-1531.

PMID: 37280375 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-023-01139-5.


Effectiveness of Therapeutic Community Program on Resilience and Change in Lifestyle in People With Alcohol Use Disorder.

Song E, Kim H, Lee M J Addict Nurs. 2023; 33(4):255-263.

PMID: 37140413 PMC: 9741996. DOI: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000492.


Polysubstance use in young people accessing residential and day-treatment services for substance use: substance use profiles, psychiatric comorbidity and treatment completion.

Mefodeva V, Carlyle M, Walter Z, Chan G, Hides L Addiction. 2022; 117(12):3110-3120.

PMID: 35851706 PMC: 9804256. DOI: 10.1111/add.16008.


Effects of a Residential Multimodal Psychological Treatment in an Addicted Population, at 6 and 12 Months: Differences Between Men and Women.

Santos-de-Pascual A, Lopez-Cano L, Alcantara-Lopez M, Martinez-Perez A, Castro-Saez M, Fernandez-Fernandez V Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:862858.

PMID: 35782433 PMC: 9243417. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.862858.


References
1.
Nemes S, Wish E, Messina N . Comparing the impact of standard and abbreviated treatment in a therapeutic community. Findings from the district of Columbia treatment initiative experiment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1999; 17(4):339-47. DOI: 10.1016/s0740-5472(99)00009-4. View

2.
Malivert M, Fatseas M, Denis C, Langlois E, Auriacombe M . Effectiveness of therapeutic communities: a systematic review. Eur Addict Res. 2011; 18(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1159/000331007. View

3.
MOOS R, Moos B, Andrassy J . Outcomes of four treatment approaches in community residential programs for patients with substance use disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 1999; 50(12):1577-83. DOI: 10.1176/ps.50.12.1577. View

4.
Landrum B, Knight D, Becan J, Flynn P . To Stay or Not To Stay: Adolescent Client, Parent, and Counselor Perspectives on Leaving Substance Abuse Treatment Early. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2015; 24(6):344-354. PMC: 4597590. DOI: 10.1080/1067828X.2013.844088. View

5.
Warren K, Hiance D, Doogan N, De Leon G, Phillips G . Verbal feedback in therapeutic communities: pull-ups and reciprocated pull-ups as predictors of graduation. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012; 44(4):361-8. PMC: 3556212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.08.020. View