» Articles » PMID: 30248921

Does the Number of Fingers on the Bag Influence Volume Delivery? A Randomized Model Study of Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation in Infants

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2018 Sep 26
PMID 30248921
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We sought to compare the effectiveness of two versus five fingers used for bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation on effective tidal volume (V) delivery in an infant resuscitation model. In a randomised cross-over study, 40 healthcare professionals ventilated a modified leak-free infant resuscitation manikin with both two and five fingers, using a self-inflating bag. The delivered and effective tidal volumes, ventilation rate, and mask leak were measured and recorded using a respiratory function monitor. We found no significant differences in the V (five-finger 61.7 ± 23.9 vs. two-finger 58.8 ± 16.6 mL; = 0.35) or ventilatory minute volume (2.71 ± 1.59 vs. 2.76 ± 1.24 L/min; = 0.40) of both BVM ventilation techniques. However, there was an increase in the delivered tidal volume (V) and mask leak when using the five-finger technique compared with the two-finger technique (V 96.1 ± 19.4 vs. 87.7 ± 15.5 mL; < 0.01; and mask leak 34.6 ± 23.0 vs. 30.0 ± 21.0%; = 0.02). Although the five-finger technique was associated with an increased mask leak, the number of fingers used during the BVM ventilation had no effect on V in an infant resuscitation model.

Citing Articles

Pathophysiology and Prevention of Manual-Ventilation-Induced Lung Injury (MVILI).

White L, Conrad S, Alexander J Pathophysiology. 2024; 31(4):583-595.

PMID: 39449524 PMC: 11503381. DOI: 10.3390/pathophysiology31040042.

References
1.
Donoghue A, Hsieh T, Myers S, Mak A, Sutton R, Nadkarni V . Videographic assessment of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality in the pediatric emergency department. Resuscitation. 2015; 91:19-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.03.007. View

2.
ODonnell C, Davis P, Morley C . Positive pressure ventilation at neonatal resuscitation: review of equipment and international survey of practice. Acta Paediatr. 2004; 93(5):583-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb02981.x. View

3.
Maconochie I, Bingham R, Eich C, Lopez-Herce J, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Rajka T . European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 6. Paediatric life support. Resuscitation. 2015; 95:223-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.028. View

4.
Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios L . A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:1. PMC: 2824145. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1. View

5.
Prause G, Oswald S, Himler D, Wildner G, Gemes G . The Medizinercorps Graz: a 120-year-old institution of emergency medicine. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013; 17(3):416-20. DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2013.785622. View