» Articles » PMID: 30246783

A Meta-Analysis to Determine Strength Training Related Dose-Response Relationships for Lower-Limb Muscle Power Development in Young Athletes

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2018 Sep 25
PMID 30246783
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is well-documented that strength training (ST) improves measures of muscle strength in young athletes. Less is known on transfer effects of ST on proxies of muscle power and the underlying dose-response relationships. The objectives of this meta-analysis were to quantify the effects of ST on lower limb muscle power in young athletes and to provide dose-response relationships for ST modalities such as frequency, intensity, and volume. A systematic literature search of electronic databases identified 895 records. Studies were eligible for inclusion if (i) healthy trained children (girls aged 6-11 y, boys aged 6-13 y) or adolescents (girls aged 12-18 y, boys aged 14-18 y) were examined, (ii) ST was compared with an active control, and (iii) at least one proxy of muscle power [squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump height (CMJ)] was reported. Weighted mean standardized mean differences (SMDwm) between subjects were calculated. Based on the findings from 15 statistically aggregated studies, ST produced significant but small effects on CMJ height (SMDwm = 0.65; 95% CI 0.34-0.96) and moderate effects on SJ height (SMDwm = 0.80; 95% CI 0.23-1.37). The sub-analyses revealed that the moderating variable expertise level (CMJ height: = 0.06; SJ height: N/A) did not significantly influence ST-related effects on proxies of muscle power. "Age" and "sex" moderated ST effects on SJ ( = 0.005) and CMJ height ( = 0.03), respectively. With regard to the dose-response relationships, findings from the meta-regression showed that none of the included training modalities predicted ST effects on CMJ height. For SJ height, the meta-regression indicated that the training modality "training duration" significantly predicted the observed gains ( = 0.02), with longer training durations (>8 weeks) showing larger improvements. This meta-analysis clearly proved the general effectiveness of ST on lower-limb muscle power in young athletes, irrespective of the moderating variables. Dose-response analyses revealed that longer training durations (>8 weeks) are more effective to improve SJ height. No such training modalities were found for CMJ height. Thus, there appear to be other training modalities besides the ones that were included in our analyses that may have an effect on SJ and particularly CMJ height. ST monitoring through rating of perceived exertion, movement velocity or force-velocity profile could be promising monitoring tools for lower-limb muscle power development in young athletes.

Citing Articles

Characterization of Fitness Profiles in Youth Soccer Players in Response to Playing Roles Through Principal Component Analysis.

Becerra Patino B, Montenegro Bonilla A, Paucar-Uribe J, Rada-Perdigon D, Olivares-Arancibia J, Yanez-Sepulveda R J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025; 10(1).

PMID: 39982281 PMC: 11843846. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk10010040.


Establishing reference values for tensiomyography-derived parameters in soccer players: insights from a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Paravlic A Biol Sport. 2025; 42(1):171-192.

PMID: 39758175 PMC: 11694203. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2025.139853.


Validity of Rating of Perceived Exertion Scales in Relation to Movement Velocity and Exercise Intensity During Resistance-Exercise: A Systematic Review.

Petro J, Ferrari G, Cardozo L, Vargas-Molina S, Carbone L, Kreider R Sports Health. 2024; :19417381241260412.

PMID: 38910451 PMC: 11569527. DOI: 10.1177/19417381241260412.


Strength Training Frequency and Athletic Performance in High School Girls Basketball Players.

Viramontes E, Dawes J, Coburn J, Lockie R J Hum Kinet. 2024; 91(Spec Issue):19-31.

PMID: 38689579 PMC: 11057622. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/184042.


Improvements in Jump Height, Speed, and Quality of Life through an 8-Week Strength Program in Male Adolescents Soccer Players.

Diaz-Hidalgo S, Ranchal-Sanchez A, Jurado-Castro J Sports (Basel). 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38535730 PMC: 10975651. DOI: 10.3390/sports12030067.


References
1.
Moraes E, Fleck S, Dias M, Simao R . Effects on strength, power, and flexibility in adolescents of nonperiodized vs. daily nonlinear periodized weight training. J Strength Cond Res. 2013; 27(12):3310-21. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828de8c3. View

2.
Lillegard W, Brown E, Wilson D, Henderson R, Lewis E . Efficacy of strength training in prepubescent to early postpubescent males and females: effects of gender and maturity. Pediatr Rehabil. 1997; 1(3):147-57. DOI: 10.3109/17518429709167353. View

3.
Gonzalez-Badillo J, Pareja-Blanco F, Rodriguez-Rosell D, Abad-Herencia J, Del Ojo-Lopez J, Sanchez-Medina L . Effects of velocity-based resistance training on young soccer players of different ages. J Strength Cond Res. 2014; 29(5):1329-38. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000764. View

4.
Chelly M, Fathloun M, Cherif N, Ben Amar M, Tabka Z, Van Praagh E . Effects of a back squat training program on leg power, jump, and sprint performances in junior soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2009; 23(8):2241-9. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b86c40. View

5.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2011; 3(3):e123-30. PMC: 3090117. View