» Articles » PMID: 30242533

Social Style and Resilience of Macaques' Networks, a Theoretical Investigation

Overview
Journal Primates
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Sep 23
PMID 30242533
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Group-living animals rely on efficient transmission of information for optimal exploitation of their habitat. How efficient and resilient a network is depend on its structure, which is a consequence of the social interactions of the individuals that comprise the network. In macaques, network structure differs according to dominance style. Networks of intolerant species are more modular, more centralized, and less connected than those of tolerant ones. Given these structural differences, networks of intolerant species are potentially more vulnerable to fragmentation and decreased information transmission when central individuals disappear. Here we studied network resilience and efficiency in artificial societies of macaques. The networks were produced with an individual-based model that has been shown to reproduce the structural features of networks of tolerant and intolerant macaques. To study network resilience, we deleted either central individuals or individuals at random and studied the effects of these deletions on network cohesiveness and efficiency. The deletion of central individuals had more negative effects than random deletions from the networks of both tolerant and intolerant artificial societies. Central individuals thus appeared to aid in the maintenance of network cohesiveness and efficiency. Further, the networks of both intolerant and tolerant societies appeared to be robust to the loss of individuals, as network fragmentation was never observed. Our results suggest that despite differences in network structure, networks of tolerant and intolerant macaques may be equally resilient.

Citing Articles

Simulated poaching affects global connectivity and efficiency in social networks of African savanna elephants-An exemplar of how human disturbance impacts group-living species.

Wisniewska M, Puga-Gonzalez I, Lee P, Moss C, Russell G, Garnier S PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(1):e1009792.

PMID: 35041648 PMC: 8797174. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009792.


Evolutionary advantages of turning points in human cooperative behaviour.

Vilone D, Realpe-Gomez J, Andrighetto G PLoS One. 2021; 16(2):e0246278.

PMID: 33561142 PMC: 7872229. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246278.


Decrease in social cohesion in a colonial seabird under a perturbation regime.

Genovart M, Gimenez O, Bertolero A, Choquet R, Oro D, Pradel R Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):18720.

PMID: 33127979 PMC: 7603481. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75259-3.


Interactions with humans are jointly influenced by life history stage and social network factors and reduce group cohesion in moor macaques (Macaca maura).

Morrow K, Glanz H, Ngakan P, Riley E Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):20162.

PMID: 31882849 PMC: 6934674. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56288-z.


Editorial: Social networks analyses in primates, a multilevel perspective.

Puga-Gonzalez I, Sosa S, Sueur C Primates. 2019; 60(3):163-165.

PMID: 30900040 DOI: 10.1007/s10329-019-00720-5.

References
1.
Aureli F, Preston S, de Waal F . Heart rate responses to social interactions in free-moving rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): a pilot study. J Comp Psychol. 1999; 113(1):59-65. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.113.1.59. View

2.
Hsu , Wolf . The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav. 1999; 57(4):903-910. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1049. View

3.
Klein E, Gebhart C, Duhamel G . Fatal outbreaks of proliferative enteritis caused by Lawsonia intracellularis in young colony-raised rhesus macaques. J Med Primatol. 1999; 28(1):11-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0684.1999.tb00084.x. View

4.
Barabasi , ALBERT . Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999; 286(5439):509-12. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509. View

5.
Hemelrijk . Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure. Anim Behav. 2000; 59(5):1035-1048. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1400. View