Surgical Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures Using Absorbable Implants: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Overview

Journal Hand (N Y)

Publisher Sage Publications

Specialties General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2018 Sep 22

PMID 30239220

Citations 7

Authors

Jessica Hazan

Alain Joe Azzi

Stephanie Thibaudeau

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Despite the proven efficacy and advantages of absorbable implants, their use for metacarpal shaft fixation has been limited. This is likely due to the high reported complication rates in early studies with polyglycolic acid (PGA) implants, notably high rates of noninfectious inflammatory reaction (5%-25%), occurring up to 30 weeks after fixation. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of newer absorbable plates and screws in the treatment of metacarpal shaft fractures.

Methods: The authors performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases dating from 1946 to 2017. Primary outcome measures were the development of noninfectious inflammatory reaction and implant failure.

Results: A total of 42 metacarpal shaft fractures in 35 patients were included. The average follow-up time was 20.4 months (n = 24; range: 3.6-61 months). Only 1 case (2.4%) of noninfectious inflammatory reaction was reported with polylactic acid (PLA) plates and PLA/PGA compounds. Noninfectious inflammatory reaction was observed in 4 out of the 9 patients (44.4%) with a trimethylene carbonate/PLA compound. Symptoms appeared after an average time of 15.8 months (range: 12-19 months) post-fixation. Painless prolonged inflammation that resolved spontaneously within 6 months was reported in 7.1% of cases (n = 3). Implant failure with loss of fracture reduction was reported in 9.5% of cases (n = 4).

Conclusions: Newer absorbable materials appear to have significantly lower rates of noninfectious inflammatory reaction than previously reported. When compared with metallic fixation of the metacarpal shaft, absorbable fixation appears to have comparable complication rates and biomechanical properties.

Citing Articles

Indian Hand Anthropometry: Computer Tomography-Based Morphometric Analysis of Metacarpal.

Reddy M, Pai G M, Kumar M, Bhat A, Annapareddy A, Thatte M Indian J Plast Surg. 2024; 57(4):270-277.

PMID: 39345671 PMC: 11436343. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787688.

Polylactic acid bioabsorbable implants of the hand: A review.

Jee E, Robichaux-Edwards L, Montgomery C, Bilderback K, Perry K, Massey P J Hand Microsurg. 2024; 16(3):100053.

PMID: 39035860 PMC: 11257132. DOI: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100053.

Are Absorbable Plates More Resistant to Infection Than Titanium Implants? An Experimental Pre-Clinical Trial in Rabbits.

Kitridis D, Savvidis P, Cheva A, Papalois A, Givissis P, Chalidis B J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(10).

PMID: 37888163 PMC: 10607271. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14100498.

The balanced microenvironment regulated by the degradants of appropriate PLGA scaffolds and chitosan conduit promotes peripheral nerve regeneration.

Lu P, Wang G, Qian T, Cai X, Zhang P, Li M Mater Today Bio. 2021; 12:100158.

PMID: 34841240 PMC: 8605345. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100158.

Biodegradable metals for bone fracture repair in animal models: a systematic review.

Zhang J, Shang Z, Jiang Y, Zhang K, Li X, Ma M Regen Biomater. 2021; 8(1):rbaa047.

PMID: 33732493 PMC: 7947587. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbaa047.

References

Van Bakelen N, Vermeulen K, Buijs G, Jansma J, de Visscher J, Hoppenreijs T . Cost-Effectiveness of a Biodegradable Compared to a Titanium Fixation System in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0130330. PMC: 4507946. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130330. View

Bozic K, Perez L, Wilson D, Fitzgibbons P, Jupiter J . Mechanical testing of bioresorbable implants for use in metacarpal fracture fixation. J Hand Surg Am. 2001; 26(4):755-61. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.24145. View

Bostman O . Absorbable implants for the fixation of fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73(1):148-53. View

Waris E, Ashammakhi N, Happonen H, Raatikainen T, Kaarela O, Tormala P . Bioabsorbable miniplating versus metallic fixation for metacarpal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (410):310-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000063789.32430.c6. View

Fusetti C, Meyer H, Borisch N, Stern R, Della Santa D, Papaloizos M . Complications of plate fixation in metacarpal fractures. J Trauma. 2002; 52(3):535-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200203000-00019. View

Givissis P, Stavridis S, Papagelopoulos P, Antonarakos P, Christodoulou A . Delayed foreign-body reaction to absorbable implants in metacarpal fracture treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(12):3377-83. PMC: 2974869. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1388-3. View

Lionelli G, Korentager R . Biomechanical failure of metacarpal fracture resorbable plate fixation. Ann Plast Surg. 2002; 49(2):202-6. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-200208000-00015. View

Dumont C, Fuchs M, Burchhardt H, Appelt D, Bohr S, Sturmer K . Clinical results of absorbable plates for displaced metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2007; 32(4):491-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.02.005. View

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010; 8(5):336-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007. View

10.

Waris E, Ashammakhi N, Raatikainen T, Tormala P, Santavirta S, Konttinen Y . Self-reinforced bioabsorbable versus metallic fixation systems for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2002; 27(5):902-9. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.35082. View

11.

Waris E, Ninkovic M, Harpf C, Ninkovic M, Ashammakhi N . Self-reinforced bioabsorbable miniplates for skeletal fixation in complex hand injury: three case reports. J Hand Surg Am. 2004; 29(3):452-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.01.013. View

12.

Waris E, Ashammakhi N, Kaarela O, Raatikainen T, Vasenius J . Use of bioabsorbable osteofixation devices in the hand. J Hand Surg Br. 2004; 29(6):590-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.02.005. View

13.

Stern P, Wieser M, Reilly D . Complications of plate fixation in the hand skeleton. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; (214):59-65. View

14.

Bostman O . Metallic or absorbable fracture fixation devices. A cost minimization analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (329):233-9. View

15.

Choi J, Lee J, Kim S, Kim Y, Jun Y . Foreign-Body Granuloma after Metacarpal Fracture Treatment with Absorbable Implants. Arch Plast Surg. 2015; 42(4):505-7. PMC: 4513067. DOI: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.505. View

16.

Ozer K, Gillani S, Williams A, Peterson S, Morgan S . Comparison of intramedullary nailing versus plate-screw fixation of extra-articular metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33(10):1724-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.07.011. View

17.

Sakai A, Oshige T, Zenke Y, Menuki K, Murai T, Nakamura T . Mechanical comparison of novel bioabsorbable plates with titanium plates and small-series clinical comparisons for metacarpal fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(17):1597-604. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01673. View

18.

Bernstein M, Chung K . Hand fractures and their management: an international view. Injury. 2006; 37(11):1043-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.020. View