Tissue Biomechanics During Cranial Neural Tube Closure Measured by Brillouin Microscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography

Overview

Journal Birth Defects Res

Specialties Reproductive Medicine
Toxicology

Date 2018 Sep 22

PMID 30239173

Citations 30

Authors

Jitao Zhang

Raksha Raghunathan

Justin Rippy

Chen Wu

Richard H Finnell

Kirill V Larin

Giuliano Scarcelli

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Embryonic development involves the interplay of driving forces that shape the tissue and the mechanical resistance that the tissue offers in response. While increasing evidence has suggested the crucial role of physical mechanisms underlying embryo development, tissue biomechanics is not well understood because of the lack of techniques that can quantify the stiffness of tissue in situ with 3D high-resolution and in a noncontact manner.

Methods: We used two all-optical techniques, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Brillouin microscopy, to map the longitudinal modulus of the tissue from mouse embryos in situ.

Results: We acquired 2D mechanical maps of the neural tube region of embryos at embryonic day (E) 8.5 (n = 2) and E9.5 (n = 2) with submicron spatial resolution. We found the modulus of tissue varied distinctly within the neural tube region of the same embryo and between embryos at different development stages, suggesting our technique has enough sensitivity and spatial resolution to monitor the tissue mechanics during embryonic development in a noncontact and noninvasive manner.

Conclusions: We demonstrated the capability of OCT-guided Brillouin microscopy to quantify tissue longitudinal modulus of mouse embryos in situ, and observed distinct change in the modulus during the closure of cranial neural tube. Although this preliminary work cannot provide definitive conclusions on biomechanics of neural tube closure yet as a result of the limited number of samples, it provides an approach of quantifying the tissue mechanics during embryo development in situ, thus could be helpful in investigating the role of tissue biomechanics in the regulation of embryonic development. Our next study involving more embryo samples will investigate systematic changes in tissue mechanics during embryonic development.

Citing Articles

Brillouin microscopy.

Kabakova I, Zhang J, Xiang Y, Caponi S, Bilenca A, Guck J Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2024; 4.

PMID: 39391288 PMC: 11465583. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-023-00286-z.

Optical coherence tomography-guided Brillouin microscopy highlights regional tissue stiffness differences during anterior neural tube closure in the Mthfd1l murine mutant.

Ambekar Y, Caiaffa C, Wlodarczyk B, Singh M, Schill A, Steele J Development. 2024; 151(10).

PMID: 38682273 PMC: 11165724. DOI: 10.1242/dev.202475.

Design of neural organoids engineered by mechanical forces.

Suong D, Imamura K, Kato Y, Inoue H IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2024; 16:190-195.

PMID: 38328799 PMC: 10847990. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.01.004.

Monitoring the Mechanical Evolution of Tissue During Neural Tube Closure of Chick Embryo.

Shi C, Handler C, Florn H, Zhang J J Vis Exp. 2023; (201).

PMID: 38009716 PMC: 11456995. DOI: 10.3791/66117.

In vivo dynamic volumetric imaging of mouse testis and epididymis with optical coherence tomography†.

Umezu K, Musina G, Larina I Biol Reprod. 2023; 110(2):365-376.

PMID: 37971359 PMC: 10873499. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioad158.

References

Elsayad K, Werner S, Gallemi M, Kong J, Sanchez Guajardo E, Zhang L . Mapping the subcellular mechanical properties of live cells in tissues with fluorescence emission-Brillouin imaging. Sci Signal. 2016; 9(435):rs5. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aaf6326. View

McShane S, Mole M, Savery D, Greene N, Tam P, Copp A . Cellular basis of neuroepithelial bending during mouse spinal neural tube closure. Dev Biol. 2015; 404(2):113-24. PMC: 4528075. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.06.003. View

Ingber D . Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again. FASEB J. 2006; 20(7):811-27. DOI: 10.1096/fj.05-5424rev. View

Nieman B, Bock N, Bishop J, Chen X, Sled J, Rossant J . Magnetic resonance imaging for detection and analysis of mouse phenotypes. NMR Biomed. 2005; 18(7):447-68. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.981. View

Wallingford J, Niswander L, Shaw G, Finnell R . The continuing challenge of understanding, preventing, and treating neural tube defects. Science. 2013; 339(6123):1222002. PMC: 3677196. DOI: 10.1126/science.1222002. View

Schoenwolf G, Smith J . Mechanisms of neurulation: traditional viewpoint and recent advances. Development. 1990; 109(2):243-70. DOI: 10.1242/dev.109.2.243. View

Galea G, Cho Y, Galea G, Mole M, Rolo A, Savery D . Biomechanical coupling facilitates spinal neural tube closure in mouse embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(26):E5177-E5186. PMC: 5495245. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700934114. View

Miller C, Davidson L . The interplay between cell signalling and mechanics in developmental processes. Nat Rev Genet. 2013; 14(10):733-44. PMC: 4056017. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3513. View

Ophir J, Kaisar Alam S, Garra B, Kallel F, Konofagou E, Krouskop T . Elastography: Imaging the elastic properties of soft tissues with ultrasound. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2016; 29(4):155. DOI: 10.1007/BF02480847. View

10.

Davidson L, Joshi S, Kim H, von Dassow M, Zhang L, Zhou J . Emergent morphogenesis: elastic mechanics of a self-deforming tissue. J Biomech. 2009; 43(1):63-70. PMC: 2813421. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.010. View

11.

Botto L, Moore C, Khoury M, Erickson J . Neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(20):1509-19. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199911113412006. View

12.

Davidson L . Epithelial machines that shape the embryo. Trends Cell Biol. 2011; 22(2):82-7. PMC: 3273669. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.10.005. View

13.

Kruse S, Smith J, Lawrence A, Dresner M, Manduca A, Greenleaf J . Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: preliminary results. Phys Med Biol. 2000; 45(6):1579-90. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/6/313. View

14.

Daniels B, Masi B, Wirtz D . Probing single-cell micromechanics in vivo: the microrheology of C. elegans developing embryos. Biophys J. 2006; 90(12):4712-9. PMC: 1471839. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.080606. View

15.

Martin A, Goldstein B . Apical constriction: themes and variations on a cellular mechanism driving morphogenesis. Development. 2014; 141(10):1987-98. PMC: 4011084. DOI: 10.1242/dev.102228. View

16.

Palombo F, Winlove C, Edginton R, Green E, Stone N, Caponi S . Biomechanics of fibrous proteins of the extracellular matrix studied by Brillouin scattering. J R Soc Interface. 2014; 11(101):20140739. PMC: 4223901. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0739. View

17.

Zhang J, Nou X, Kim H, Scarcelli G . Brillouin flow cytometry for label-free mechanical phenotyping of the nucleus. Lab Chip. 2017; 17(4):663-670. PMC: 5310767. DOI: 10.1039/c6lc01443g. View

18.

BARER R, ROSS K, Tkaczyk S . Refractometry of living cells. Nature. 1953; 171(4356):720-4. DOI: 10.1038/171720a0. View

19.

Foster F, Zhang M, Duckett A, Cucevic V, Pavlin C . In vivo imaging of embryonic development in the mouse eye by ultrasound biomicroscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44(6):2361-6. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0911. View

20.

Weber G, Bjerke M, DeSimone D . A mechanoresponsive cadherin-keratin complex directs polarized protrusive behavior and collective cell migration. Dev Cell. 2011; 22(1):104-15. PMC: 3264825. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.013. View