» Articles » PMID: 30235474

Analysis of the Performance of 11 Formulae for Fetal Weight Estimation in Preterm Fetuses with Abnormal Doppler Velocimetry - A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Abstract

Objective:  To assess 11 formulae commonly used to estimate fetal weight in a population of premature fetuses who had abnormal Doppler velocimetry due to early-onset placental insufficiency. The performance of each formula was evaluated in subgroups of fetuses with expected growth and intrauterine growth restriction.

Methods:  Data were collected from fetuses and mothers who delivered at three Brazilian hospitals between November 2002 and December 2013. We used the following formulae: Campbell; Hadlock I, II, III, IV and V; Shepard; Warsof; Weiner I and II; and Woo III.

Results:  We analyzed 194 fetuses. Of these, 116 (59.8%) were considered appropriate for gestational age (AGA), and 103 (53.1%) were male. The amniotic fluid volume was reduced in 87 (44.8%) fetuses, and the umbilical artery Doppler revealed absence or inversion of diastolic flow in 122 (62.9%) cases, and the analysis of the ductus venosus revealed abnormal flow in 60 (34.8%) fetuses. The Hadlock formulae using three or four fetal biometric parameters had low absolute percentage error in the estimated fetal weight among preterm fetuses with abnormal Doppler studies who were born within 5 days of the ultrasound evaluation. The results were not influenced by the clinical and ultrasound parameters often found in early-onset placental insufficiency.

Conclusion:  In this study, the formulae with the best performance for fetal weight estimation in the analyzed population were Hadlock I and IV, which use four and three fetal biometric parameters respectively to estimate the weight of preterm fetuses with abnormal Doppler studies.

References
1.
Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R . Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000 g. J Perinat Med. 2004; 32(2):155-61. DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2004.028. View

2.
Blumenfeld Y, Lee H, Pullen K, Wong A, Pettit K, Taslimi M . Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in small for gestational age pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009; 23(8):790-3. DOI: 10.3109/14767050903387052. View

3.
Burd I, Srinivas S, Pare E, Dharan V, Wang E . Is sonographic assessment of fetal weight influenced by formula selection?. J Ultrasound Med. 2009; 28(8):1019-24. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.8.1019. View

4.
Nardozza L, Araujo Junior E, Vieira M, Rolo L, Moron A . [Estimate of birth weight using two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2010; 56(2):204-8. DOI: 10.1590/s0104-42302010000200020. View

5.
Unterscheider J, ODonoghue K, Daly S, Geary M, Kennelly M, McAuliffe F . Fetal growth restriction and the risk of perinatal mortality-case studies from the multicentre PORTO study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:63. PMC: 3923738. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-63. View