» Articles » PMID: 30232790

Sex-Specific Changes in Physical Performance Following Military Training: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Sep 21
PMID 30232790
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Men and women joining the military undergo the same training, often in mixed-sex platoons. Given the inherent physiological and physical performance differences between men and women, it is reasonable to question whether sex differences exist in the adaptation to military training and, therefore, whether sex-specific training should be employed to optimise training adaptations.

Objective: To systematically review the literature evaluating changes in the physical performance of men and women following military training.

Methods: Six database sources were searched in addition to extensive secondary searching. Primary prospective intervention studies (all designs) evaluating physical training interventions in military populations, reporting pre- to post-training changes in physical fitness outcomes for both women and men, were included.

Results: We screened 3966 unique records. Twenty-nine studies (n = 37 study reports) were included, most of which were conducted in the USA and evaluated initial training for military recruits. Positive changes were more consistently observed in aerobic fitness and muscle strength (whole body and upper body) outcomes than lower body strength, muscle power or muscle endurance outcomes, following physical training. Relative pre- to post-training changes for all outcome measures tended to be greater in women than men although few statistically significant sex by outcome/time interactions were observed.

Conclusion: Improvements in some, but not all, performance components were observed following a period of military training. Largely, these improvements were not significantly different between sexes. Further prospective research is needed to evaluate sex-specific differences in the response to physical training in controlled conditions to improve military physical training outcomes for both sexes.

Citing Articles

A comparison of role-related physical fitness between British Army trainees and trained soldiers.

Rue C, Needham-Beck S, Maroni T, Siddall A, Ashdown K, Lee B Eur J Sport Sci. 2024; 25(1):e12227.

PMID: 39622779 PMC: 11680188. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12227.


High Physical Exposure During Female Recruits' Basic Military Training in Sweden-A Descriptive Study.

Kierkegaard M, Tegern M, Halvarsson A, Broman L, Larsson H Mil Med. 2023; 189(3-4):e674-e682.

PMID: 37625078 PMC: 10898928. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usad335.


Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains.

Warneke K, Zech A, Wagner C, Konrad A, Nakamura M, Keiner M Front Physiol. 2023; 13:1078301.

PMID: 36685189 PMC: 9846774. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1078301.


Factors Influencing the Executive Functions of Male and Female Cadets.

Zurek G, Lenart D, Lachowicz M, Zebrowski K, Jamro D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(24).

PMID: 36554935 PMC: 9779467. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192417043.


Whey Protein Supplementation Effects on Body Composition, Performance, and Blood Biomarkers During Army Initial Entry Training.

McAdam J, Lyons K, Beck D, Haun C, Romero M, Mumford P Front Nutr. 2022; 9:807928.

PMID: 35330708 PMC: 8940516. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.807928.


References
1.
Daniels W, Kowal D, Vogel J, Stauffer R . Physiological effects of a military training program on male and female cadets. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1979; 50(6):562-6. View

2.
Nindl B . Physical Training Strategies for Military Women's Performance Optimization in Combat-Centric Occupations. J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29 Suppl 11:S101-6. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001089. View

3.
Courtright S, McCormick B, Postlethwaite B, Reeves C, Mount M . A meta-analysis of sex differences in physical ability: revised estimates and strategies for reducing differences in selection contexts. J Appl Psychol. 2013; 98(4):623-41. DOI: 10.1037/a0033144. View

4.
Hickson R . Interference of strength development by simultaneously training for strength and endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980; 45(2-3):255-63. DOI: 10.1007/BF00421333. View

5.
Greeves J . Physiological Implications, Performance Assessment and Risk Mitigation Strategies of Women in Combat-Centric Occupations. J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29 Suppl 11:S94-100. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001116. View