» Articles » PMID: 30232721

Efficacy and Safety of Low-intensity Shock Wave Therapy in Penile Rehabilitation Post Nerve-sparing Radical Cystoprostatectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2018 Sep 21
PMID 30232721
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the role of low-intensity extra corporeal shock wave therapy (LI-ESWT) in penile rehabilitation (PR) post nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy (NS-RCP).

Materials And Methods: This study included 152 sexually active men with muscle invasive bladder cancer. After bilateral NS-RCP with orthotopic diversion by a single expert surgeon between June 2014 and July 2016, 128 patients were available categorized into three groups: LI-ESWT group (42 patients), phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) group (43 patients), and control group (43 patients).

Results: Mean age was 53.2 ± 6.5 years. Mean ± SD follow-up period was 21 ± 8 months. During first follow-up FU1, all patients of the three groups had insufficient erection for vaginal penetration; with decrease of preoperative IIEF-EF mean score from 27.9 to 6.9. Potency recovery rates at 9 months were 76.2%, 79.1%, and 60.5% in LI-ESWT, PDE5i, and control groups, respectively. There was statistically significant increase in IIEF-EF and EHS scores during all follow-up periods in all the study groups (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the three groups during all follow-up periods. Statistical evaluation showed no significant difference in continence and oncological outcomes during all follow-up points among the three groups (p = 0.55 and 0.07, respectively).

Conclusions: During last follow-up, 16% more patients in LI-ESWT group had recovery of potency as compared to the control group. Although the difference is not statistically significant, but of clinical importance. LI-ESWT is safe as oral PDE5i in penile rehabilitation post nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy.

Citing Articles

Global research trends on the links between prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction between 2003 and 2023: A bibliometrics and visualized study.

He S, Zhang S, Sun X, Liu R, Yuan T, Chen X Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e33834.

PMID: 39027554 PMC: 11255577. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33834.


Indirect assessment of low-intensity shockwave therapy's energy density and pulse frequency for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review, bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Hinojosa-Gonzalez D, Talamas Mendoza A, Torres-Martinez M, Diaz-Garza K, Hernandez B, Munoz Hibert M Int J Impot Res. 2024; .

PMID: 38778153 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-024-00910-w.


Effectiveness of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Erectile Dysfunction: An Analysis of Sexual Function and Penile Hardness at Erection: An Umbrella Review.

Medrano-Sanchez E, Pena-Cantonero B, Candon-Ballester P, Blanco-Diaz M, Diaz-Mohedo E J Pers Med. 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38392610 PMC: 10890328. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14020177.


Variations in Low Intensity Shockwave Treatment Protocols for Erectile Dysfunction: A Review of the Literature and Guide to Offering Treatment.

Hayon S, Panken E, Bennett N World J Mens Health. 2023; 42(2):283-289.

PMID: 37853533 PMC: 10949028. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230105.


The use of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy in management of erectile dysfunction following prostate cancer treatment: a review of the current literature.

Matthew A, Rogers D, Grob G, Blottner M, Kodama S, Krzastek S Transl Androl Urol. 2023; 12(6):1023-1032.

PMID: 37426598 PMC: 10323450. DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-791.


References
1.
Gruenwald I, Appel B, Vardi Y . Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy--a novel effective treatment for erectile dysfunction in severe ED patients who respond poorly to PDE5 inhibitor therapy. J Sex Med. 2011; 9(1):259-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02498.x. View

2.
Qureshi A, Ross K, Ogawa R, Orgill D . Shock wave therapy in wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128(6):721e-727e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c7d1. View

3.
Vardi Y, Appel B, Jacob G, Massarwi O, Gruenwald I . Can low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy improve erectile function? A 6-month follow-up pilot study in patients with organic erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2010; 58(2):243-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.004. View

4.
Raina R, Agarwal A, Ausmundson S, Lakin M, Nandipati K, Montague D . Early use of vacuum constriction device following radical prostatectomy facilitates early sexual activity and potentially earlier return of erectile function. Int J Impot Res. 2005; 18(1):77-81. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901380. View

5.
Lu Z, Lin G, Reed-Maldonado A, Wang C, Lee Y, Lue T . Low-intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment Improves Erectile Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016; 71(2):223-233. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.050. View