» Articles » PMID: 30229897

Single-cell Genetic Analysis of Clonal Dynamics in Colorectal Adenomas Indicates CDX2 Gain As a Predictor of Recurrence

Overview
Journal Int J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Sep 20
PMID 30229897
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Colorectal adenomas are common precancerous lesions with the potential for malignant transformation to colorectal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic polypectomy provides an opportunity for cancer prevention; however, recurrence rates are high. We collected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue of 15 primary adenomas with recurrence, 15 adenomas without recurrence, and 14 matched pair samples (primary adenoma and the corresponding recurrent adenoma). The samples were analysed by array-comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) and single-cell multiplex interphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation (miFISH) to understand clonal evolution, to examine the dynamics of copy number alterations (CNAs) and to identify molecular markers for recurrence prediction. The miFISH probe panel consisted of 14 colorectal carcinogenesis-relevant genes (COX2, PIK3CA, APC, CLIC1, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, CDX2, CDH1, TP53, HER2, SMAD7, SMAD4 and ZNF217), and a centromere probe (CEP10). The aCGH analysis confirmed the genetic landscape typical for colorectal tumorigenesis, that is, CNAs of chromosomes 7, 13q, 18 and 20q. Focal aberrations (≤10 Mbp) were mapped to chromosome bands 6p22.1-p21.33 (33.3%), 7q22.1 (31.4%) and 16q21 (29.4%). MiFISH detected gains of EGFR (23.6%), CDX2 (21.8%) and ZNF217 (18.2%). Most adenomas exhibited a major clone population which was accompanied by multiple smaller clone populations. Gains of CDX2 were exclusively seen in primary adenomas with recurrence (25%) compared to primary adenomas without recurrence (0%). Generation of phylogenetic trees for matched pair samples revealed four distinct patterns of clonal dynamics. In conclusion, adenoma development and recurrence are complex genetic processes driven by multiple CNAs whose evaluations by miFISH, with emphasis on CDX2, might serve as a predictor of recurrence.

Citing Articles

Prediction of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia by KRAS mutation in polyps.

Martinez-Roca A, Cubiella J, Garcia-Heredia A, Guill-Berbegal D, Baile-Maxia S, Mangas-Sanjuan C United European Gastroenterol J. 2024; 12(9):1179-1189.

PMID: 39400528 PMC: 11578838. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12667.


Spatial characterization and stratification of colorectal adenomas by deep visual proteomics.

Kabatnik S, Post F, Drici L, Bartels A, Strauss M, Zheng X iScience. 2024; 27(9):110620.

PMID: 39252972 PMC: 11381895. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110620.


Formalin Fixation, Delay to Fixation, and Time in Fixative Adversely Impact Copy Number Variation Analysis by aCGH.

Li J, Greytak S, Guan P, Engel K, Goerlitz D, Islam M Biopreserv Biobank. 2022; 21(4):407-416.

PMID: 36169416 PMC: 10460690. DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0036.


Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Evaluation of CDX2 and Ki67 in Colorectal Lesions with their Expression Pattern in Different Histologic Variants, Grade, and Stage of Colorectal Carcinomas.

Nayak J, Mohanty P, Lenka A, Sahoo N, Agrawala S, Panigrahi S J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2022; 9(4):183-189.

PMID: 35070694 PMC: 8751680. DOI: 10.4103/JMAU.JMAU_69_20.


Copy-number intratumor heterogeneity increases the risk of relapse in chemotherapy-naive stage II colon cancer.

Lahoz S, Archilla I, Asensio E, Hernandez-Illan E, Ferrer Q, Lopez-Prades S J Pathol. 2022; 257(1):68-81.

PMID: 35066875 PMC: 9790656. DOI: 10.1002/path.5870.


References
1.
Roberts R, Min L, Washington M, Olsen S, Settle S, Coffey R . Importance of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in establishment of adenomas and maintenance of carcinomas during intestinal tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(3):1521-6. PMC: 122223. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.032678499. View

2.
Sottoriva A, Kang H, Ma Z, Graham T, Salomon M, Zhao J . A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth. Nat Genet. 2015; 47(3):209-16. PMC: 4575589. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3214. View

3.
Ried T, Heselmeyer-Haddad K, Blegen H, Schrock E, Auer G . Genomic changes defining the genesis, progression, and malignancy potential in solid human tumors: a phenotype/genotype correlation. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999; 25(3):195-204. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(199907)25:3<195::aid-gcc1>3.0.co;2-8. View

4.
Wangsa D, Chowdhury S, Ryott M, Gertz E, Elmberger G, Auer G . Phylogenetic analysis of multiple FISH markers in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma suggests that a diverse distribution of copy number changes is associated with poor prognosis. Int J Cancer. 2015; 138(1):98-109. PMC: 4823771. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29691. View

5.
Ruschoff J, Bocker T, Schlegel J, Stumm G, Hofstaedter F . Microsatellite instability: new aspects in the carcinogenesis of colorectal carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 1995; 426(3):215-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF00191357. View