» Articles » PMID: 30227828

Genetic Selection Against Intrauterine Growth Retardation in Piglets: a Problem at the Piglet Level with a Solution at the Sow Level

Overview
Journal Genet Sel Evol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Biology
Genetics
Date 2018 Sep 20
PMID 30227828
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In polytocous livestock species, litter size and offspring weight act antagonistically; in modern pig breeds, selection for increased litter size has resulted in lower mean birth weights, an increased number of small piglets and an increased number of those affected by varying degrees of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR). IUGR poses life-long challenges, both mental, with morphological brain changes and altered cognition, and physical, such as immaturity of organs, reduced colostrum intake and weight gain. In pigs, head morphology of newborn piglets is a good phenotypic marker for identifying such compromised piglets. Growth retardation could be considered as a property of the dam, in part due to either uterine capacity or insufficiency. A novel approach to this issue is to consider the proportion of IUGR-affected piglets in a litter as an indirect measure of uterine capacity. However, uterine capacity or sufficiency cannot be equated solely to litter size and thus is a trait difficult to measure on farm.

Results: A total of 21,159 Landrace × Large White or Landrace × White Duroc piglets (born over 52 weeks) with recorded head morphology and birth weights were followed from birth until death or weaning. At the piglet level, the estimated heritability for IUGR (as defined by head morphology) was low at 0.01 ± 0.01. Piglet direct genetic effects of birth weight (h = 0.07 ± 0.02) were strongly negatively correlated with head morphology (- 0.93), in that IUGR-affected piglets tended to have lower birth weights. At the sow level, analysis of the proportion of IUGR-affected piglets in a litter gave a heritability of 0.20 ± 0.06, with high and negative genetic correlations of the proportion of IUGR-affected piglets with average offspring birth weight (- 0.90) and with the proportion of piglets surviving until 24 h (- 0.80).

Conclusions: This suggests that the proportion of IUGR-affected piglets in a litter is a suitable indirect measure of uterine capacity for inclusion in breeding programmes that aim at reducing IUGR in piglets and improving piglet survival.

Citing Articles

Thriving or Striving: Comparing Intra-Uterine Growth Restricted, Low Birth Weight and Normal Birth Weight Piglets within the First 24 Hours.

Loyens M, Van Bockstal L, Prims S, Van Cruchten S, Van Ginneken C Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272295 PMC: 11394454. DOI: 10.3390/ani14172508.


Effects of slaughter weight on carcass characteristics, meat quality, and metabolomics profiling in the muscle of Tianfu finishing pigs.

Li Y, Tao X, Zhao P, Zhou J, Ao X Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1420634.

PMID: 39005725 PMC: 11239573. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1420634.


Factors contributing to high performance of sows in free farrowing systems.

Baxter E, Bowers N, King R, Brocklehurst S, Edwards S Porcine Health Manag. 2024; 10(1):16.

PMID: 38698485 PMC: 11064381. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-024-00366-w.


The current status of Korean native pig production.

Lee E, Jang J, Oh S J Anim Sci Technol. 2024; 65(6):1169-1179.

PMID: 38616882 PMC: 11007292. DOI: 10.5187/jast.2023.e120.


Genome wide association study of thyroid hormone levels following challenge with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Van Goor A, Pasternak A, Walugembe M, Chehab N, Hamonic G, Dekkers J Front Genet. 2023; 14:1110463.

PMID: 36845393 PMC: 9947478. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1110463.


References
1.
Mousseau T, Roff D . Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity (Edinb). 1987; 59 ( Pt 2):181-97. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1987.113. View

2.
Vermeulen L, Van Beirendonck S, Bulens A, Van Thielen J, Driessen B . Sire line of pigs affects weaning weight, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of offspring. J Anim Sci. 2016; 94(10):4360-4368. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016-0591. View

3.
Hama K, Aoki J, Inoue A, Endo T, Amano T, Motoki R . Embryo spacing and implantation timing are differentially regulated by LPA3-mediated lysophosphatidic acid signaling in mice. Biol Reprod. 2007; 77(6):954-9. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.060293. View

4.
Merila J, Sheldon B . Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity (Edinb). 1999; 83 ( Pt 2):103-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00585.x. View

5.
Kirschner M, Gerhart J . Evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(15):8420-7. PMC: 33871. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8420. View