» Articles » PMID: 30225386

Pharmaconutrition Administration on Outcomes of Elective Oncological Surgery for Gastrointestinal Malignancies: is Timing Everything?-a Review of Published Meta-analyses Until the End of 2016

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2018 Sep 19
PMID 30225386
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The last 25 years have seen an increasing number of publications attesting the benefits of pharmaconutrition in the management of patients undergoing elective oncological gastrointestinal surgery. A number of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses suggest the use of pharmaconutrition in this group of patients produces superior outcomes to standard nutritional formulations in terms of postoperative infective complications, anastomotic breakdown and length of hospital stay. The use of pharmaconutrition products, therefore, has gained increasing acceptance for use in elective gastrointestinal oncological surgical populations and been incorporated into practice guidelines. However, there remains doubts as to the robustness of such data supporting these recommendation. This is because studies reporting improved outcomes with pharmaconutrition (I) frequently compare this intervention with non-equivalent control groups; (II) do not report on the actual nutritional provision received by study participants; (III) overlook the potential impact of industry funding on research conducted and (IV) do not adopt a multi-disciplinary approach to the research undertaken. For these reasons, a critical re-appraisal of the use and recommendations of pharmaconutrition in this group of patients is urgently warranted to resolve some of the above mentioned issues. The aim of this review was to analyse meta-analyses published until the end of 2016 in this area to highlight the strengths and weakness of the present research and prioritize certain areas which will benefit from future research.

Citing Articles

Methodological quality of research on perioperative immunomodulatory supplementation in oncological gastrointestinal tract surgery: a meta-research protocol.

Lima L, Mello A, Nascimento G, Trindade E BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e082112.

PMID: 39059807 PMC: 11284874. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082112.


Long-term outcomes after perioperative treatment with omega-3 fatty acid supplements in colorectal cancer.

Sorensen L, Rasmussen S, Calder P, Yilmaz M, Schmidt E, Thorlacius-Ussing O BJS Open. 2020; 4(4):678-684.

PMID: 32391656 PMC: 7397352. DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50295.

References
1.
Jiang X, Li N, Zhu W, Wu G, Quan Z, Li J . Effects of postoperative immune-enhancing enteral nutrition on the immune system, inflammatory responses, and clinical outcome. Chin Med J (Engl). 2004; 117(6):835-9. View

2.
Gianotti L, Braga M, Gentilini O, Balzano G, Zerbi A, Di Carlo V . Artificial nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas. 2000; 21(4):344-51. DOI: 10.1097/00006676-200011000-00004. View

3.
Kingham T, Pachter H . Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208(2):269-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.015. View

4.
Farreras N, Artigas V, Cardona D, Rius X, Trias M, Gonzalez J . Effect of early postoperative enteral immunonutrition on wound healing in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. Clin Nutr. 2005; 24(1):55-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.07.002. View

5.
Klek S, Kulig J, Sierzega M, Szczepanek K, Szybinski P, Scislo L . Standard and immunomodulating enteral nutrition in patients after extended gastrointestinal surgery--a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2008; 27(4):504-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.04.010. View