» Articles » PMID: 30224334

Use and the Users of a Patient Portal: Cross-Sectional Study

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2018 Sep 19
PMID 30224334
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient portals offer patients access to their medical information and tools to communicate with health care providers. It has been shown that patient portals have the potential to positively impact health outcomes and efficiency of health care. It is therefore important that health care organizations identify the patients who use or do not use the patient portal and explore the reasons in either case. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) is a frequently used theory for explaining the use of information technology. It consists of the following constructs: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and behavioral intention to use.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the prevalence of patient portal use and the characteristics of patients who use or do not use a patient portal. The main constructs of UTAUT, together with demographics and disease- and care-related characteristics, have been measured to explore the predictive factors of portal use.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the outpatient departments for adult patients of a university hospital in the Netherlands. Following outcomes were included: self-reported portal use, characteristics of users such as demographics, disease- and care-related data, eHealth literacy (modified score), and scores of UTAUT constructs. Descriptive analyses and univariate and multivariate logistic regression were also conducted.

Results: In the analysis, 439 adult patients were included. Furthermore, 32.1% (141/439) identified as being a user of the patient portal; 31.2% (137/439) indicated as nonusers, but being aware of the existence of the portal; and 36.6% (161/439) as being nonusers not aware of the existence of the portal. In the entire study population, the factors of being chronically ill (odds ratio, OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04-2.52) and eHealth literacy (modified score; OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.18) best predicted portal use. In users and nonusers who were aware of the portal, UTAUT constructs were added to the multivariate logistic regression, with chronically ill and modified eHealth literacy sum score. Effort expectancy (OR 13.02, 95% CI 5.68-29.87) and performance expectancy (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.65-4.90) are shown to significantly influence portal use in this group.

Conclusions: Approximately one-third of the patients of a university hospital self-reported using the patient portal; most expressed satisfaction. At first sight, being chronically ill and higher scores on the modified eHealth literacy scale explained portal use. Adding UTAUT constructs to the model revealed that effort expectancy (ease of use and knowledge and skills related to portal use) and performance expectancy (perceived usefulness) influenced portal use. Interventions to improve awareness of the portal and eHealth literacy skills of patients and further integration of the patient portal in usual face-to-face care are needed to increase use and potential subsequent patient benefits.

Citing Articles

Understanding Psychosocial Barriers to Healthcare Technology Adoption: A Review of TAM Technology Acceptance Model and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and UTAUT Frameworks.

Lee A, Ramasamy R, Subbarao A Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(3).

PMID: 39942440 PMC: 11816427. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13030250.


Digital Information Exchange Between the Public and Researchers in Health Studies: Scoping Review.

Soltani N, Dietz T, Ochterbeck D, Dierkes J, Restel K, Christianson L J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e63373.

PMID: 39874566 PMC: 11815310. DOI: 10.2196/63373.


Intention to use patient portal and its predictors among patient with diabetes in Amhara region referral hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2023: UTAUT-2 model.

Wubete Abebe A, Tilahun B, Mekonnen Z, Tegegne M Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241277177.

PMID: 39347512 PMC: 11428164. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241277177.


Evaluation of Experiences and Attitudes of Patients Towards Patient Portal-Enabled Access to Their Health Information or Medical Records: A Qualitative Grounded Theory Study.

Kuppanda P, Jenkins J Qual Health Res. 2023; 33(12):1080-1090.

PMID: 37575030 PMC: 10552347. DOI: 10.1177/10497323231192379.


Interest in using patient portals among adolescents in mental health care - a cross-sectional study.

Nielsen M, Steinsbekk A, Nost T BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):841.

PMID: 37559093 PMC: 10410786. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09823-8.


References
1.
Jhamb M, Cavanaugh K, Bian A, Chen G, Ikizler T, Unruh M . Disparities in Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Use in Nephrology Clinics. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015; 10(11):2013-22. PMC: 4633780. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01640215. View

2.
Emani S, Yamin C, Peters E, Karson A, Lipsitz S, Wald J . Patient perceptions of a personal health record: a test of the diffusion of innovation model. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(6):e150. PMC: 3517342. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2278. View

3.
van der Vaart R, van Deursen A, Drossaert C, Taal E, van Dijk J, van de Laar M . Does the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) measure what it intends to measure? Validation of a Dutch version of the eHEALS in two adult populations. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(4):e86. PMC: 3222202. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1840. View

4.
Bursac Z, Gauss C, Williams D, Hosmer D . Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008; 3:17. PMC: 2633005. DOI: 10.1186/1751-0473-3-17. View

5.
Weingart S, Rind D, Tofias Z, Sands D . Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 13(1):91-5. PMC: 1380201. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1833. View