Exploring Peptide⁻Solvent Interactions: A Computational Study

Overview

Journal Molecules

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biology

Date 2018 Sep 19

PMID 30223458

Citations 1

Authors

Nadia Elghobashi-Meinhardt

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The dilemma of reconciling the contradictory evidence regarding the conformation of long solvated peptide chains is the so-called "reconciliation problem". Clues regarding the stability of certain conformations likely lie in the electronic structure at the peptide⁻solvent interface, but the peptide⁻solvent interaction is not fully understood. Here, we study the influence of aqueous solvent on peptide conformations by using classical molecular dynamics (MD) and quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) energy calculations. The model systems include an 11-residue peptide, X 2 A 7 O 2 (XAO), where X, A, and O denote diaminobutyric acid, alanine, and ornithine, respectively, and a 9-mer (Arg-Pro-Pro-Gly-Phe-Ser-Ala-Phe-Lys). Spectroscopic and MD data present conflicting evidence regarding the structure of XAO in water; some results indicate that XAO adopts a polyproline II (P II ) conformation, whereas other findings suggest that XAO explores a range of conformations. To investigate this contradiction, we present here the results of MD simulations of XAO and the 9-mer in aqueous solution, combined with QM/MM energy calculations.

Citing Articles

Interface Characterization Between Polyethylene/ Silica in Engineered Cementitious Composites by Molecular Dynamics Simulation.

Zhou S, Vu-Bac N, Arash B, Zhu H, Zhuang X Molecules. 2019; 24(8).

PMID: 30995822 PMC: 6515107. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24081497.

References

Makowska J, Rodziewicz-Motowidlo S, Baginska K, Vila J, Liwo A, Chmurzynski L . Polyproline II conformation is one of many local conformational states and is not an overall conformation of unfolded peptides and proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(6):1744-9. PMC: 1413657. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0510549103. View

Vanommeslaeghe K, Hatcher E, Acharya C, Kundu S, Zhong S, Shim J . CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J Comput Chem. 2009; 31(4):671-90. PMC: 2888302. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21367. View

Ishida H . Essential function of the N-termini tails of the proteasome for the gating mechanism revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins. 2014; 82(9):1985-99. DOI: 10.1002/prot.24553. View

Ramachandran G, Sasisekharan V . Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Adv Protein Chem. 1968; 23:283-438. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60402-7. View

Kelly M, Chellgren B, Rucker A, Troutman J, Fried M, Miller A . Host-guest study of left-handed polyproline II helix formation. Biochemistry. 2001; 40(48):14376-83. DOI: 10.1021/bi011043a. View

Zagrovic B, Lipfert J, Sorin E, Millett I, van Gunsteren W, Doniach S . Unusual compactness of a polyproline type II structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(33):11698-703. PMC: 1187952. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409693102. View

Schweitzer-Stenner R, Measey T . The alanine-rich XAO peptide adopts a heterogeneous population, including turn-like and polyproline II conformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(16):6649-54. PMC: 1871840. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700006104. View

Makowska J, Rodziewicz-Motowidlo S, Baginska K, Makowski M, Vila J, Liwo A . Further evidence for the absence of polyproline II stretch in the XAO peptide. Biophys J. 2007; 92(8):2904-17. PMC: 1831701. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.097550. View

Mantz Y, Gerard H, Iftimie R, Martyna G . Ab initio and empirical model MD simulation studies of solvent effects on the properties of N-methylacetamide along a cis-trans isomerization pathway. J Phys Chem B. 2006; 110(27):13523-38. DOI: 10.1021/jp060999y. View

10.

Kabsch W, Sander C . Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983; 22(12):2577-637. DOI: 10.1002/bip.360221211. View

11.

Best R, Zhu X, Shim J, Lopes P, Mittal J, Feig M . Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013; 8(9):3257-3273. PMC: 3549273. DOI: 10.1021/ct300400x. View

12.

Best R, Mittal J, Feig M, MacKerell Jr A . Inclusion of many-body effects in the additive CHARMM protein CMAP potential results in enhanced cooperativity of α-helix and β-hairpin formation. Biophys J. 2012; 103(5):1045-51. PMC: 3433603. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.07.042. View

13.

Huang J, Rauscher S, Nawrocki G, Ran T, Feig M, de Groot B . CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat Methods. 2016; 14(1):71-73. PMC: 5199616. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4067. View

14.

Mikhonin A, Bykov S, Myshakina N, Asher S . Peptide secondary structure folding reaction coordinate: correlation between uv raman amide III frequency, Psi Ramachandran angle, and hydrogen bonding. J Phys Chem B. 2006; 110(4):1928-43. DOI: 10.1021/jp054593h. View

15.

Kentsis A, Mezei M, Gindin T, Osman R . Unfolded state of polyalanine is a segmented polyproline II helix. Proteins. 2004; 55(3):493-501. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20051. View

16.

Prabhu N, Sharp K . Protein-solvent interactions. Chem Rev. 2006; 106(5):1616-23. PMC: 2584800. DOI: 10.1021/cr040437f. View

17.

Mansiaux Y, Joseph A, Gelly J, de Brevern A . Assignment of PolyProline II conformation and analysis of sequence--structure relationship. PLoS One. 2011; 6(3):e18401. PMC: 3069088. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018401. View

18.

Phillips J, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E . Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem. 2005; 26(16):1781-802. PMC: 2486339. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20289. View

19.

Blanco S, Lopez J, Lesarri A, Alonso J . Microsolvation of formamide: a rotational study. J Am Chem Soc. 2006; 128(37):12111-21. DOI: 10.1021/ja0618393. View

20.

Shi Z, Olson C, Rose G, Baldwin R, Kallenbach N . Polyproline II structure in a sequence of seven alanine residues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(14):9190-5. PMC: 123116. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.112193999. View