» Articles » PMID: 30222122

Real-world Experience of the Left Distal Transradial Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Prospective Observational Study (LeDRA)

Overview
Date 2018 Sep 18
PMID 30222122
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the left distal transradial approach (ldTRA) as a default route for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods And Results: Between October 2017 and January 2018, 200 consecutive patients were enrolled in a single centre. The left distal radial artery was punctured with a 20-gauge venipuncture catheter needle by three expert left radial approach operators. The success rates of arterial puncture, CAG, and PCI were 95.5% (191/200), 100% (187/187), and 98.9% (86/87), respectively. Four patients scheduled for staged PCI skipped the routine diagnostic CAG. Puncture time and fluoroscopic time were 3.0±2.8 minutes and 11.3±18.4 minutes, respectively. Haemostasis time was 151.8±39.9 minutes. A total of 15 (7.9%) puncture site complications occurred, including 14 (7.4%) minor haematomas and one (0.5%) arterial dissection, in which the artery was patent at one-month follow-up. Two patients complained of left thumb numbness at one-month follow-up. No distal radial artery occlusion, perforation, pseudoaneurysm, or arteriovenous fistula occurred.

Conclusions: The success and complication rates of ldTRA support the feasibility and safety of this procedure. Larger randomised comparison studies are needed to support this preliminary evidence.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and success rate of Distal Radial Artery Access at the Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Intervention at Central Chest Institute of Thailand.

Thongplung K, Kanaderm C, Witayanan J, Kanoksilp A, Chantadansuwan T BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025; 25(1):115.

PMID: 39972419 PMC: 11837435. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-025-04545-7.


Impact of Nitroglycerine Injection on Radial Artery Outcomes in Distal Transradial Access.

Karaca M, Dagdeviren B Anatol J Cardiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39885713 PMC: 11904254. DOI: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.4877.


A Multicenter Retrospective Study Evaluating Distal Radial Access vs. Conventional Transradial or Transvenous Access for Endovascular Treatment of Malfunctioning Dialysis Fistulas.

Minici R, Venturini M, Guzzardi G, Fontana F, Coppola A, Piacentino F Life (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39598181 PMC: 11595542. DOI: 10.3390/life14111382.


Comparison of radial artery occlusion between traditional radial access and distal radial access for coronary angiography and intervention: A prospective cohort study.

Zahedmehr A, Dousti A, Alemzadeh-Ansari M, Gharibzadeh A, Sheibani M, MozafaryBazargany M Heliyon. 2024; 10(20):e39451.

PMID: 39502239 PMC: 11535977. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39451.


Traditional Versus Distal Radial Access for Coronary Diagnostic and Revascularization Procedures: Final Results of the TENDERA Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study.

Babunashvili A, Pancholy S, Zulkarnaev A, Kaledin A, Kochanov I, Korotkih A Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024; 104(7):1396-1405.

PMID: 39474765 PMC: 11667409. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31271.