Effect of Aspirin on All-Cause Mortality in the Healthy Elderly
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: In the primary analysis of the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial, now published in the Journal, we report that the daily use of aspirin did not provide a benefit with regard to the primary end point of disability-free survival among older adults. A numerically higher rate of the secondary end point of death from any cause was observed with aspirin than with placebo.
Methods: From 2010 through 2014, we enrolled community-dwelling persons in Australia and the United States who were 70 years of age or older (or ≥65 years of age among blacks and Hispanics in the United States) and did not have cardiovascular disease, dementia, or disability. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg of enteric-coated aspirin or placebo. Deaths were classified according to the underlying cause by adjudicators who were unaware of trial-group assignments. Hazard ratios were calculated to compare mortality between the aspirin group and the placebo group, and post hoc exploratory analyses of specific causes of death were performed.
Results: Of the 19,114 persons who were enrolled, 9525 were assigned to receive aspirin and 9589 to receive placebo. A total of 1052 deaths occurred during a median of 4.7 years of follow-up. The risk of death from any cause was 12.7 events per 1000 person-years in the aspirin group and 11.1 events per 1000 person-years in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.29). Cancer was the major contributor to the higher mortality in the aspirin group, accounting for 1.6 excess deaths per 1000 person-years. Cancer-related death occurred in 3.1% of the participants in the aspirin group and in 2.3% of those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.56).
Conclusions: Higher all-cause mortality was observed among apparently healthy older adults who received daily aspirin than among those who received placebo and was attributed primarily to cancer-related death. In the context of previous studies, this result was unexpected and should be interpreted with caution. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others; ASPREE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01038583 .).
Shah S, Chen Y, Owen A, Woods R, Ryan J, Owen N BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(1):e000709.
PMID: 40018171 PMC: 11812841. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000709.
Sammons E, Bowman L, Stevens W, Buck G, Hammami I, Parish S BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e090605.
PMID: 40010818 PMC: 11865773. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090605.
Chemopreventive strategies for sporadic colorectal cancer: a narrative review.
Monson S, Chen P, Gangi A, Waters K, Billet S, Hendifar A Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025; 10:11.
PMID: 39944579 PMC: 11811562. DOI: 10.21037/tgh-24-97.
Gao C, Hou Q, Cao H, Li C, Peng X, Han Q J Int Med Res. 2025; 53(2):3000605251315359.
PMID: 39917854 PMC: 11806481. DOI: 10.1177/03000605251315359.
Zhou Z, Moran C, Murray A, Zoungas S, Magnussen C, Chong T Neurology. 2025; 104(4):e210247.
PMID: 39879572 PMC: 11774555. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210247.