» Articles » PMID: 30216176

Cosmetic Outcomes of Infraumbilical, Supraumbilical, and Transumbilical Entry Routes in Laparoscopic Surgery

Overview
Journal Turk J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 Sep 15
PMID 30216176
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine which of the umbilical entry routes for intraperitoneal access has a better cosmetic result.

Material And Methods: This was a prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). In total, 105 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were included. A vertical or transverse umbilical incision is appropriately made for the trocar to be inserted, and an infraumbilical, supraumbilical, or transumbilical route was preferred for initial intraperitoneal access. Demographic data of patients, body mass indices, entry point of the trocars (infraumbilical-transumbilical-supraumbilical), type of incision (vertical-transverse), duration of the operation, and scar properties at postoperative week 12 were prospectively collected and analyzed. The Vancouver scar scale was used to evaluate the cosmetic results.

Results: Cosmetic results did not differ statistically between the transumbilical-infraumbilical-supraumbilical groups. The variables, such as vascularity, height, and total score, of the Vancouver scar scale were significantly higher in patients who had transverse incisions. There was no statistically significant effect of using a Veress needle with the cosmetic results. There was no statistically significant correlation between age, gravida, body mass indices, skin thickness, time of entry, duration of the operation, and cosmetic results in terms of vascularity, height, and total score.

Conclusion: During laparoscopic surgery, each patient should be assessed individually for the satisfaction of the patient and, thereby, of the surgeon in terms of cosmetic outcomes. Vertical incision offers superior cosmetic effects than transverse incision. Further research is required to define long-term scar-related outcomes of the laparoscopic intraperitoneal access techniques.

Citing Articles

Comparison of three umbilical entry sites for intraperitoneal access by the direct trocar insertion technique: a randomized pilot study.

Mansouri G, Nikseresht A, Robati F, Salehiniya H, Allahqoli L, Alkatout I J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2024; 25(3):116-123.

PMID: 39219186 PMC: 11576642. DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2024.2023-6-11.


Transumbilical laparoscopy for pneumoperitoneum establishment: a comprehensive multicentre evaluation affirming safety, feasibility, and a range of clinical benefits.

Rizzuto A, Bozzarello C, Andreuccetti J, Amaddeo A, Iannello A, Sagnelli C Front Surg. 2024; 11:1390038.

PMID: 38712337 PMC: 11070471. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1390038.


Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Modified Bidirectional Intra-Umbilical Incision versus Infra-Umbilical Incision for Direct Trocar Insertion in Gynaecological Laparoscopy: A randomised controlled trial.

Darwish A, Tawfik M, Gaflan A, Darwish D Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2023; 23(4):455-462.

PMID: 38090239 PMC: 10712379. DOI: 10.18295/squmj.5.2023.027.


Comparison of Two Entry Methods and Their Cosmetic Outcomes in Creating Pneumoperitoneum: A Prospective Observational Study.

Hiremath S, Ahmed Z Surg J (N Y). 2022; 8(3):e239-e244.

PMID: 36062182 PMC: 9439881. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756182.


Optimal instrument length for transumbilical laparoendoscopic single site (U-LESS) surgery.

Zaliznyak M, Chen A, Kuhlmann P, Weinberger J, Zhao H, Tobis S J Robot Surg. 2021; 16(1):53-58.

PMID: 33566275 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01208-5.

References
1.
Tulikangas P, Nicklas A, Falcone T, Price L . Anatomy of the left upper quadrant for cannula insertion. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000; 7(2):211-4. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(00)80042-0. View

2.
Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E . Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum. A multicenter study on 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15(6):566-9. DOI: 10.1007/s004640000381. View

3.
Molloy D, Kaloo P, Cooper M, Nguyen T . Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 42(3):246-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00246.x. View

4.
Dingfelder J . Direct laparoscope trocar insertion without prior pneumoperitoneum. J Reprod Med. 1978; 21(1):45-7. View

5.
Atiyeh B, Costagliola M, Hayek S . Keloid or hypertrophic scar: the controversy: review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 54(6):676-80. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000164538.72375.93. View