» Articles » PMID: 30213804

Spinal Instrumentation Rescue with Cement Augmentation

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Sep 15
PMID 30213804
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Altered biomechanics or bone fragility or both contribute to spine instrumentation failure. Although revision surgery is frequently required, minimally invasive alternatives may be feasible. We report the largest to-date series of percutaneous fluoroscopically guided vertebral cement augmentation procedures to address feasibility, safety, results and a variety of spinal instrumentation failure conditions.

Materials And Methods: A consecutive series of 31 fluoroscopically guided vertebral augmentation procedures in 29 patients were performed to address screw loosening (42 screws), cage subsidence (7 cages), and fracture within (12 cases) or adjacent to (11 cases) the instrumented segment. Instrumentation failure was deemed clinically relevant when resulting in pain or jeopardizing spinal biomechanical stability. The main study end point was the rate of revision surgery avoidance; feasibility and safety were assessed by prospective recording of periprocedural technical and clinical complications; and clinical effect was measured at 1 month with the Patient Global Impression of Change score.

Results: All except 1 procedure was technically feasible. No periprocedural complications occurred. Clinical and radiologic follow-up was available in 28 patients (median, 16 months) and 30 procedures. Revision surgery was avoided in 23/28 (82%) patients, and a global clinical benefit (Patient Global Impression of Change, 5-7) was reported in 26/30 (87%) cases at 1-month follow-up, while no substantial change (Patient Global Impression of Change, 4) was reported in 3/30 (10%), and worsening status (Patient Global Impression of Change, 3), in 1/30 (3%).

Conclusions: Our experience supports the feasibility of percutaneous vertebral augmentation in the treatment of several clinically relevant spinal instrumentation failure conditions, with excellent safety and efficacy profiles, both in avoidance of revision surgery and for pain palliation.

Citing Articles

An Extended Follow-up of Spinal Instrumentation Rescue with Cement Augmentation.

Polinelli F, Pileggi M, Cabrilo I, Commodaro C, Van Kuijk S, Cardia A AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024; 45(11):1805-1810.

PMID: 38914434 PMC: 11543086. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8394.


When spinal instrumentation revision is not an option: Salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications: A systematic review.

Cawley D, Divani K, Shafafy R, Devitt A, Molloy S Brain Spine. 2023; 3:101726.

PMID: 37383448 PMC: 10293288. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101726.


Intervertebral Body Implant Salvage: Stabilization by Bone Augmentation.

Amoretti N, Burns R, Ranc P, Elbaze S, Sala V, Pavan L Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023; 46(7):959-961.

PMID: 37316695 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03480-4.


Cement Augmentation of Two-Level Lumbar Corpectomy Cage After Malposition: A Novel Salvage Procedure Technical Note.

Hamad M, Ryvlin J, Langro J, Obeidallah A, Marin J, De La Garza Ramos R Cureus. 2022; 14(9):e29074.

PMID: 36258926 PMC: 9558766. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29074.


Efficacy of Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Augmentation for Correcting Low Grade Pedicle Screw Loosening.

Kim C, Ju C, Lee S, Kim S Korean J Neurotrauma. 2021; 17(1):41-47.

PMID: 33981642 PMC: 8093028. DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2021.17.e2.

References
1.
Amendola L, Gasbarrini A, Fosco M, Simoes C, Terzi S, De Iure F . Fenestrated pedicle screws for cement-augmented purchase in patients with bone softening: a review of 21 cases. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011; 12(4):193-9. PMC: 3225622. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-011-0164-9. View

2.
Fransen P . Increasing pedicle screw anchoring in the osteoporotic spine by cement injection through the implant. Technical note and report of three cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 7(3):366-9. DOI: 10.3171/SPI-07/09/366. View

3.
Clark W, Bird P, Gonski P, Diamond T, Smerdely P, McNeil H . Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 388(10052):1408-1416. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31341-1. View

4.
Fourney D, Schomer D, Nader R, Chlan-Fourney J, Suki D, Ahrar K . Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98(1 Suppl):21-30. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2003.98.1.0021. View

5.
Cianfoni A, Massari F, Ewing S, Persenaire M, Rumboldt Z, Bonaldi G . Combining percutaneous pedicular and extrapedicular access for tumor ablation in a thoracic vertebral body. Interv Neuroradiol. 2014; 20(5):603-8. PMC: 4243230. DOI: 10.15274/INR-2014-10018. View