» Articles » PMID: 30212910

Spfy: an Integrated Graph Database for Real-time Prediction of Bacterial Phenotypes and Downstream Comparative Analyses

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Sep 14
PMID 30212910
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Public health laboratories are currently moving to whole-genome sequence (WGS)-based analyses, and require the rapid prediction of standard reference laboratory methods based solely on genomic data. Currently, these predictive genomics tasks rely on workflows that chain together multiple programs for the requisite analyses. While useful, these systems do not store the analyses in a genome-centric way, meaning the same analyses are often re-computed for the same genomes. To solve this problem, we created Spfy, a platform that rapidly performs the common reference laboratory tests, uses a graph database to store and retrieve the results from the computational workflows and links data to individual genomes using standardized ontologies. The Spfy platform facilitates rapid phenotype identification, as well as the efficient storage and downstream comparative analysis of tens of thousands of genome sequences. Though generally applicable to bacterial genome sequences, Spfy currently contains 10 243 Escherichia coli genomes, for which in-silico serotype and Shiga-toxin subtype, as well as the presence of known virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance determinants have been computed. Additionally, the presence/absence of the entire E. coli pan-genome was computed and linked to each genome. Owing to its database of diverse pre-computed results, and the ability to easily incorporate user data, Spfy facilitates hypothesis testing in fields ranging from population genomics to epidemiology, while mitigating the re-computation of analyses. The graph approach of Spfy is flexible, and can accommodate new analysis software modules as they are developed, easily linking new results to those already stored. Spfy provides a database and analyses approach for E. coli that is able to match the rapid accumulation of WGS data in public databases.

Citing Articles

An overview of graph databases and their applications in the biomedical domain.

Timon-Reina S, Rincon M, Martinez-Tomas R Database (Oxford). 2021; 2021.

PMID: 34003247 PMC: 8130509. DOI: 10.1093/database/baab026.


Assessing the genomic relatedness and evolutionary rates of persistent verotoxigenic serotypes within a closed beef herd in Canada.

Wang L, Jokinen C, Laing C, Johnson R, Ziebell K, Gannon V Microb Genom. 2020; 6(6).

PMID: 32496181 PMC: 7371104. DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000376.


Formal Medical Knowledge Representation Supports Deep Learning Algorithms, Bioinformatics Pipelines, Genomics Data Analysis, and Big Data Processes.

Dhombres F, Charlet J Yearb Med Inform. 2019; 28(1):152-155.

PMID: 31419827 PMC: 6697514. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677933.

References
1.
Wattam A, Davis J, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T, Bun C . Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 45(D1):D535-D542. PMC: 5210524. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1017. View

2.
Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J . Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2010; 11(8):R86. PMC: 2945788. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86. View

3.
Seemann T . Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(14):2068-9. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. View

4.
Hunt M, Mather A, Sanchez-Buso L, Page A, Parkhill J, Keane J . ARIBA: rapid antimicrobial resistance genotyping directly from sequencing reads. Microb Genom. 2017; 3(10):e000131. PMC: 5695208. DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000131. View

5.
Carrillo C, Koziol A, Mathews A, Goji N, Lambert D, Huszczynski G . Comparative Evaluation of Genomic and Laboratory Approaches for Determination of Shiga Toxin Subtypes in Escherichia coli. J Food Prot. 2017; 79(12):2078-2085. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-228. View