» Articles » PMID: 30208209

Does Medical Therapy Improve SinoNasal Outcomes Test-22 Domain Scores? An Analysis of Clinically Important Differences

Overview
Journal Laryngoscope
Date 2018 Sep 13
PMID 30208209
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the 22-item SinoNasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) electing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) are well described. However, similar estimations for the MCID have not been investigated for patients electing continued appropriate medical therapy (CAMT). We sought to determine MCID values for a medically treated CRS cohort and compare them to historical MCIDs associated with ESS.

Study Design: Prospective observational cohort study.

Methods: One hundred twenty patients with refractory CRS electing CAMT were prospectively enrolled from academic referral clinics into an observational cohort study. Baseline and posttreatment SNOT-22 survey responses were collected. Four distribution-based methods for calculating MCIDs (e.g., half-standard deviation, Cohen's d, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change) were used to identify a range of MCID values for SNOT-22 total and domain scores.

Results: The average MCID value for SNOT-22 total scores was 8.0, whereas mean MCID values for rhinologic, extranasal rhinologic, ear/facial, psychological, and sleep symptom domain scores were 3.9, 2.5, 3.3, 3.4, and 2.9, respectively, comparable to previously reported values for patients electing ESS. Although change in SNOT-22 total scores following CAMT exceeded the MCID, none of the average SNOT-22 domain score improvements surpassed their respective MCID thresholds.

Conclusions: MCID values for SNOT-22 total and domain scores in patients electing CAMT are similar to previously published MCID values associated with ESS, indicating that MCID values are independent of treatment modality selection. Therefore, despite evidence of statistical significance, CAMT for CRS may not be associated with clinically discernable improvements in average SNOT-22 domain scores.

Level Of Evidence: 2c Laryngoscope, 129:31-36, 2019.

Citing Articles

Canadian Real-World Study Long-Term Clinical Results Using Dupilumab for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps.

Kilty S, Lasso A J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 53:19160216241278659.

PMID: 39345032 PMC: 11450752. DOI: 10.1177/19160216241278659.


Management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the Asia-Pacific region and Russia: Recommendations from an expert working group.

Karpischenko S, Jung Y, Kim D, Spriggs K, Tsang R, Yeh T Asia Pac Allergy. 2024; 14(2):77-83.

PMID: 38827258 PMC: 11142757. DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000139.


Predictors of Sinonasal Improvement After Highly Effective Modulator Therapy in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis.

Beswick D, Liu C, Overdevest J, Zemke A, Khatiwada A, Gudis D Laryngoscope. 2024; 134(9):3965-3973.

PMID: 38634358 PMC: 11305934. DOI: 10.1002/lary.31438.


Patient-Reported Sinonasal Symptoms and Risk of Relapse in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis.

Romich E, Banerjee S, Amudala N, Chou S, Li R, Lee H Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024; 76(8):1099-1108.

PMID: 38523260 PMC: 11288776. DOI: 10.1002/acr.25329.


Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT22) score in adult population with no known sino-nasal disease.

Upreti G, Modi A, Vadher P, Chudasama P Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(8):4241-4254.

PMID: 38520535 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08557-5.


References
1.
Chowdhury N, Mace J, Smith T, Rudmik L . What drives productivity loss in chronic rhinosinusitis? A SNOT-22 subdomain analysis. Laryngoscope. 2017; 128(1):23-30. PMC: 5723565. DOI: 10.1002/lary.26723. View

2.
DeConde A, Mace J, Bodner T, Hwang P, Rudmik L, Soler Z . SNOT-22 quality of life domains differentially predict treatment modality selection in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014; 4(12):972-9. PMC: 4260999. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21408. View

3.
Levy J, Mace J, Bodner T, Alt J, Smith T . Defining the minimal clinically important difference for olfactory outcomes in the surgical treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017; 7(8):821-826. PMC: 5544549. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21964. View

4.
Rimmer J, Fokkens W, Chong L, Hopkins C . Surgical versus medical interventions for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (12):CD006991. PMC: 11193160. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006991.pub2. View

5.
Levy J, Mace J, DeConde A, Steele T, Smith T . Improvements in psychological dysfunction after endoscopic sinus surgery for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016; 6(9):906-13. PMC: 5012934. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21776. View