» Articles » PMID: 30202198

Development and Evaluation of Two Integrated Care Models for Children Using a Partnered Formative Evaluation Approach

Overview
Journal Ethn Dis
Date 2018 Sep 12
PMID 30202198
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To describe the development and evaluation of two integrated care models using a partnered formative evaluation approach across a private foundation, clinic leaders, providers and staff, and a university-based research center.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using multiple data sources.

Setting: Two federal qualified health care centers serving low-income children and families in Chicago.

Participants: Private foundation, clinic and academic partners.

Interventions: Development of two integrated care models and partnered evaluation design.

Main Outcome Measures: Accomplishments and early lessons learned.

Results: Together, the foundation-clinic-academic partners worked to include best practices in two integrated care models for children while developing the evaluation design. A shared data collection approach, which empowered the clinic partners to collect data using a web-based tool for a prospective longitudinal cohort study, was also created.

Conclusion: Across three formative evaluation stages, the foundation, clinic, and academic partners continued to reach beyond their respective traditional roles of project oversight, clinical service, and research as adjustments were collectively made to accommodate barriers and unanticipated events. Together, an innovative shared data collection approach was developed that extends partnered research to include data collection being led by the clinic partners and supported by the technical resources of a university-based research center.

Citing Articles

A Clinical Care Monitoring and Data Collection Tool (H3 Tracker) to Assess Uptake and Engagement in Mental Health Care Services in a Community-Based Pediatric Integrated Care Model: Longitudinal Cohort Study.

McCreary M, Arevian A, Brady M, Mosqueda Chichits A, Zhang L, Tang L JMIR Ment Health. 2019; 6(4):e12358.

PMID: 31012861 PMC: 6658269. DOI: 10.2196/12358.


Editorial: Developments in Community Partnered Participatory Research for Behavioral Health.

Wells K, Jones L, Zima B, Eisen C Ethn Dis. 2018; 28(Suppl 2):287-290.

PMID: 30202179 PMC: 6128341. DOI: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.287.

References
1.
Kolko D, Perrin E . The integration of behavioral health interventions in children's health care: services, science, and suggestions. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014; 43(2):216-28. PMC: 4011180. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2013.862804. View

2.
Asarnow J, Kolko D, Miranda J, Kazak A . The Pediatric Patient-Centered Medical Home: Innovative models for improving behavioral health. Am Psychol. 2017; 72(1):13-27. DOI: 10.1037/a0040411. View

3.
Clarke G, DeBar L, Lynch F, Powell J, Gale J, OConnor E . A randomized effectiveness trial of brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for depressed adolescents receiving antidepressant medication. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005; 44(9):888-98. View

4.
Navon M, Nelson D, Pagano M, Murphy M . Use of the pediatric symptom checklist in strategies to improve preventive behavioral health care. Psychiatr Serv. 2001; 52(6):800-4. PMC: 3278792. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.6.800. View

5.
Asarnow J, Rozenman M, Wiblin J, Zeltzer L . Integrated Medical-Behavioral Care Compared With Usual Primary Care for Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169(10):929-37. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1141. View