» Articles » PMID: 30198054

Three-dimensional Analysis of Dental Arch Forms in Italian Population

Overview
Journal Prog Orthod
Publisher Springer
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2018 Sep 11
PMID 30198054
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was the comparison of male and female upper and lower dental arch form in untreated Italian patients by 3D analysis, to find differences in shape, in transversal and longitudinal diameters between sexes, and to give a representative set of population's dental arch to clinicians in order to provide suitable orthodontic treatment.

Methods: The sample consisted of 3D scans of dental casts deriving from 104 Italian untreated patients (Male = 35, Female = 69) in permanent dentition. An evaluation of the arch form was performed by angular and linear values on every patient using a 3D software (SolidWorks®). A Student's two-tailed t test was used to determine if the differences in measurements between the male and female groups were significant and the level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: Statistically significant differences in upper and lower transversal and longitudinal diameters were found. Male arch widths were significantly larger than those of females. Male intercanine, intermolar, and interpremolar diameters were significantly greater than females. Dental arch depth was significantly smaller in the female group. Anterior upper dental arch form was flatter, wider, and less sharp in the female group.

Conclusions: Basing on the anatomical arches differences found between sexes concerning Italian patients, it is suggested to have regard to each patient pre-treatment arch form, width, and depth during orthodontic treatment according to gender.

Citing Articles

Clinical implications of a mathematical-geometrical model to predict changes in the anterior arch dimension.

Paddenberg-Schubert E, Heiss R, Grunbaum T, Proff P, Kirschneck C J Orofac Orthop. 2024; .

PMID: 38806728 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-024-00531-4.


Comparative evaluation of arch form among the Nepalese population: A morphological study.

Gupta S, Fernandes R, Natarajan S, Jose N, Giri J, Dahal S J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2024; 28(1):111-118.

PMID: 38800435 PMC: 11126270. DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_280_23.


Dental arch form in a sample of Iraqi adults with sickle cell anemia using 3D scanning technique: A cross-sectional study.

Abdullah H, Ahmad H J Orthod Sci. 2024; 12:79.

PMID: 38234649 PMC: 10793861. DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_20_23.


Three-dimensional of lingual arch form and creation of templates in Iraqi normal occlusion.

Razzaq A, Dewachi Z J Orthod Sci. 2024; 12:81.

PMID: 38234645 PMC: 10793858. DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_119_22.


Relationship between vertical facial morphology and dental arch measurements in class II malocclusion: a retrospective study.

Ocak I, Karsli N, Altug A, Aksu M PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16031.

PMID: 37692120 PMC: 10487581. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16031.


References
1.
LITTLE R . The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod. 1975; 68(5):554-63. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90086-x. View

2.
Merz M, ISAACSON R, Germane N, Rubenstein L . Tooth diameters and arch perimeters in a black and a white population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991; 100(1):53-8. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70049-3. View

3.
Ferrario V, Sforza C, Miani Jr A, Tartaglia G . Human dental arch shape evaluated by euclidean-distance matrix analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1993; 90(4):445-53. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330900405. View

4.
Defraia E, Baroni G, Marinelli A . Dental arch dimensions in the mixed dentition: a study of Italian children born in the 1950s and the 1990s. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76(3):446-51. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0446:DADITM]2.0.CO;2. View

5.
Chung C, Wong W . Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class II subjects: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122(6):619-26. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.129195. View