» Articles » PMID: 30195955

Gravity Fluid Flow More Accurately Reflects Joint Fluid Pressure Compared With Commercial Peristaltic Pump Systems in a Cadaveric Model

Overview
Journal Arthroscopy
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Sep 10
PMID 30195955
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate intra-articular fluid pressures and joint compliance generated by fluid management systems on cadaveric shoulders and knees under simulated arthroscopic conditions, and to compare joint compliance between knee and shoulder specimens.

Methods: Intra-articular pressures of 5 cadaver shoulders and 5 knees were recorded for 4 arthroscopic pumps (Stryker FloControl, Stryker CrossFlow, Arthrex DualWave, DePuy Mitek FMS Duo) and a gravity feed system. Each specimen was tested 6 times with a pressure transducer for 2 minutes at 0, 25%, and 50% suction. The average pressures were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference tests (P < .05).

Results: At all suction levels, all pumps exhibited significantly greater pressure than gravity feed (P = .001 to P < .001). At both 25% and 50% suction, FloControl displayed significantly greater pressures (P 160.44 mm Hg) than the other pumps or gravity feed (P 46.9 mm Hg). CrossFlow had the lowest net percentage error (36.8%, 18.4 mm Hg) when compared with the standard pressure of 50 mm Hg, followed by gravity feed. All pumps had large initial overshoot (ie, P CrossFlow 99.4 mm Hg) followed by settling time, whereas gravity feed did not (P 55.2 mm Hg).

Conclusions: Gravity feed is an accurate, reliable delivery method for arthroscopic fluid with minimal overshoot and lower intra-articular pressure ranges than commercial pump systems. There was no evidence of plastic deformation of the joint capsule, because capsular compliance increased linearly in both knee and shoulder specimens throughout testing within the established safe range of intra-articular pressures.

Clinical Relevance: Arthroscopic flow management systems produce maximal and overshoot pressures that are not seen with gravity flow. Surgeons should understand intra-articular pressure and fluid delivery behavior during shoulder and knee arthroscopy to adapt to the variability and higher maximal pressures when using pump systems. Maintaining appropriate pressure could prevent fluid extravasation and possible neuromuscular dysfunction.

Citing Articles

Durotomy- and Irrigation-Related Serious Adverse Events During Spinal Endoscopy: Illustrative Case Series and International Surgeon Survey.

Vargas R, Hagel V, Xifeng Z, Yang H, Leon J, Lorio M Int J Spine Surg. 2023; 17(3):387-398.

PMID: 37315993 PMC: 10312151. DOI: 10.14444/8454.


Improving visualization in shoulder arthroscopy.

McDermott E, Tennent D, Song D Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023; 26(4):455-461.

PMID: 37088880 PMC: 10698137. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2022.01291.


Effects of Temperature and Volume of Intraoperative Normal Saline Irrigation on Postoperative Pain, Swelling, and Serum Markers of Inflammation in Patients After Elective, Arthroscopic, Single-Bundle Surgical Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate....

Wang C, Yang P, Zhang D, Jeon I, Yu T, Zhang Y Med Sci Monit. 2021; 27:e930954.

PMID: 34403406 PMC: 8379998. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.930954.


Carbon dioxide gas endoscopy of the deep gluteal space.

Martin H, Hatem M, Gomez-Hoyos J, Perez-Carro L, Khoury A Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2020; 33(4):550-553.

PMID: 33100526 PMC: 7549929. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1776813.


Extravasation of fluid in arthroscopic shoulder surgery requiring prolonged intubation: a case report.

Vier B, Mombell K, Gagliano E, King N, McDonald L Patient Saf Surg. 2019; 13:21.

PMID: 31205484 PMC: 6560911. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-019-0202-8.